My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dolores River DRAFT Correlation Report
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Dolores River DRAFT Correlation Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2010 11:11:04 AM
Creation date
6/10/2008 1:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
hr_0018b
Contract/PO #
PO 06-52
County
Montezuma
Dolores
San Miguel
Stream Name
Dolores River
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Sub-Basin
Upper/Lower Dolores 14030002 & 3
Water Division
7
Title
DRAFT - Dolores River Dialogue Correlation Report
Date
9/5/2006
Prepared By
Dolores River Dialogue
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Planning Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT <br />B. Current Management Hydrographs <br />This section presents a composite hydrograph for four McPhee release <br />scenarios: baseflow releases only, and small, average, and large spills. <br />Baseflow only conditions (30,000 AF) are defined as those years in which there <br />is no excess supply available for downstream releases. Based on the modeled <br />hydrology, an average spill is approximately 187,000 AF. The standard deviation <br />from the average spill was used to define a specific release for the small and <br />large spills. One standard deviation was approximately 123,000 AF, so a small <br />spill was defined as the average minus one standard deviation (187,000 AF - <br />123,000 AF = 64,000 AF). A large spill was approximately 310,000 AF (187,000 <br />AF + 123,000 AF). <br />Figure 2 presents a composite plot of these four hypothetical hydrologic <br />scenarios. Notable features that have bearing on the expected ecological <br />outcomes are the relative magnitudes of peak flows, duration of a flow that <br />performs work on the channel (raftable flows > 800 cfs generally provide this <br />amount of stream power), and the rate at which peak flows taper to the <br />baseflows (the `recession limb' of the hydrograph). These are not actual <br />operations hydrographs, but represent a coarse integration of management <br />objectives and water availability given the range of scenarios described above. <br />Composite Hydrographs of Current Management Scenarios <br />4500 <br />4000 <br />3500 <br />3000 <br />N <br />w <br />V <br />~ 2500 <br />a~ <br />L <br />~ 2000 <br />N_ <br />1500 <br />1000 - <br />500 <br />0 <br />N D J F M A M J J A S O <br />Baseflow Only 64,000 AF -Small Spill 187,000 AF -Ave Spill 310,000 AF -Large Spill <br />Figure 2. Composite Hydrographs for the four current management scenarios <br />being discussed in this section. The small spike October 1 is the 12-hour, 400 <br />cfs release for fish stocking between McPhee Dam and Bradfield Bridge. <br />9/5/06 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.