My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dolores River Core Science Report
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Dolores River Core Science Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2010 11:11:04 AM
Creation date
6/10/2008 1:10:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
hr_0018a
Contract/PO #
PO 06-52
County
Montezuma
Dolores
San Miguel
Stream Name
Dolores River
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Sub-Basin
Upper/Lower Dolores 14030002 & 3
Water Division
7
Title
Core Science Report for the Dolores River Dialogue
Date
7/1/2005
Prepared For
Nature Conservancy
Prepared By
Dolores River Dialogue
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Planning Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dolores River downstream from Bradfield Bridge was in a "near natural" condition, being <br />dominated by sandbar willow and extensive groves of cottonwood in the late 1970s. At the time, <br />tamarisk was abundant downstream of Disappointment Creek and became increasingly dominant <br />downstream (USDI 1979). The report indicated that there were extensive groves of cottonwood <br />in the Gypsum Valley in the late 1970s. There are only a few old cottonwood in the valley today, <br />but tamarisk is abundant, and monotypic stands are extensive (photos and field visits). Narrow <br />canyon reaches of the Dolores River are not well-suited to support extensive cottonwood forests <br />and are more likely to support shrub and dwarf tree commuiities (birch, sandbar willow, box <br />elder, etc.). Wider valley segments are more conducive to the formation of extensive cottonwood <br />forests. <br />Tamarisk was abundant along the Dolores River downstream of Disappointment Creek by the <br />late 1970s but was and remains less dominant upstream to McPhee reservoir. Tamarisk is limited <br />by frost and is thought to become abundant only below an elevation of about 7,000 ft on the <br />West Slope in Colorado. It is not surprising then that tamarisk is not dominant upstream of <br />Bradfield Bridge, but becomes increasingly dominant in low lying alluvial reaches downstream <br />such as in the Big Gypsum and Paradox Valleys and near the confluence with the Colorado River <br />in Utah. Because saline soils favor tamarisk, areas with high levels of salt may result in tamarisk <br />being at an advantage over some native species along some reaches of the Dolores River. <br />Sediment supplied to the river is exceptionally concentrated with salt due to exposed Marcos <br />shale formations in tributaries and along the Dolores River valley. Salt has been further <br />concentrated in low lying areas due to evaporation of water from shallow water tables and <br />subsequent concentration of salt in the upper soil horizons. The visible salt crusts in some areas <br />are lalown to ii~libit the gernunation of cottonwood seeds and the survival and growth of <br />cottonwood seedlings (Shafroth et al. 1995). Occasional overbank flooding could serve to flush <br />floodplain soils and improve conditions for cottonwood and willow establishment and <br />maintenance. Highly saline soils can increase the vulnerability of poorly adapted plants to <br />problems associated with moisture stress. <br />Kriegshauser and Sommers (2004) measured riparian vegetation along a reach of the Dolores <br />River near Lone Dome from 1988 through 2001 and recorded long-term trends. They recorded a <br />significant increase in sandbar willow cover and number, no significant change in narrowleaf <br />cottonwood cover or number, and a decline in silverberry over the 14 years considered. They <br />noted that streamside meadows appeared to have become dominated by xeric (dry adapted) <br />species. They noted that meadows historically flooded at 8,000 cfs or more, had rarely been <br />flooded since the installation of McPhee Dam in 1984. <br />The increase in sandbar willow noted by Kriegshauser and Sommers (2004) is not surprising as <br />sandbar willow can spread vegetatively by root sprouts so are not as dependent on hydrograph <br />attributes for asexual reproduction. Since peak flows have been reduced on the Dolores (by 48% <br />at Bedrock, CO; 20% at Cisco, UT), populations of willow that might have been kept from <br />encroaching on the channel by scouring annual flows have slowly colonized the formerly active <br />channel. The encroachment of willow is <br />a predictable response to the reduction in annual peak flow. Particularly along gaining reaches or <br />reaches with stable baseflow. Sandbar willow provides valuable habitat and is <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.