Laserfiche WebLink
of which rise vertically over 1000 feet from the water's edge (CO DNR et a1.,1976). The river's <br />gradient in this reach is 0.21% (11 ft/mile) (CO DNR et al., 1976). <br />San Miguel River to Colorado River <br />The San Miguel River is the largest tributary to the mainstem Dolores, and because it is <br />relatively unregulated flow volume increases substantially here at certain times of the year. <br />Downstream of the San Miguel confluence, the Dolores River flows through another narrow <br />deep canyon for 4 miles before the valley again widens, after which the river is paralleled by <br />Highway 141 and numerous gravel and dirt roads. The 31-mile reach from the San Miguel <br />confluence to Gateway has a gradient of 0.19-0.28% (10-15 ft/mile). Downstream of Gateway, <br />the river initially meanders through a broad (approximately 2-mi. wide) valley flanked by a <br />steep, sandstone dominated mesas rising 800 to 2500 ft. above the valley floor (River mile 31- <br />17), before entering a narrow, steep-walled canyon (about 0.25-mile wide) past the state border <br />(River mile 17-11) (USDI, 1979). Bed substrates consist of sand, gravel, and boulders derived <br />from episodic debris flows out of tributaries, and from roclcfall from canyon walls. The <br />lowermost portion of the Dolores River (River mile 11-0) flows through soft sediments and a <br />wider valley before entering the Colorado River (USDI, 1979). <br />Effects of flow on downstream geomorphic processes <br />The effects of diversions and storage on baseflows and high flows downstream of McPhee Dam <br />are described in detail in the Dolores River Dialogue Hydrology Report. From a geomorphic <br />perspective, the magnitude, frequency, and duration of high flows are the most important <br />elements of a river's flow regime. The following section describes the geomorphic importance of <br />high flows, historic changes in the geomorphically important components of flow regimes in the <br />Dolores River, channel-forming discharge estimates, and the expected effects of flow <br />modifications on river morphology. <br />The role of high flows in driving geomorphic processes <br />k1 recent years, river scientists have identified flow as a master variable controlling river <br />ecosystem function and have developed a strong conceptual understanding of how natural flow <br />regimes contribute to the health of river ecosystems (Poff et al. 1997, Bunn and Arthington <br />2002). Understanding of the geomorphic importance of high-flow components of river flow <br />regimes is especially well established. Peak flows are important for formation and maintenance <br />of the shape and form of the river channel (Leopold et al., 1964; Wolman and Leopold, 1957; <br />Wolman and Miller, 1960). Increases in river discharge are accommodated by increases in the <br />width, depth and/or velocity of the flow, creating greater forces on the channel bed and resulting <br />in increased ability of the river to mobilize larger and larger sediment sizes. Mobilization and <br />transport of bed sediment at high flows is responsible for maintaining channel form and can <br />result in flushing of fine sediments, reworking of gravels, formation and maintenance of pool and <br />riffle sequences, and formation and/or erosion of river bars. High flows play an important role in <br />mobilizing and transporting coarse and fine sediment inputs delivered from tributaries. hl <br />addition, ligh discharges that flow out of the channel banks carry sediment that deposits on the <br />floodplain, rejuvenating the floodplain surface and facilitating reproduction of certain riparian <br />species. High flows also counteract the effects of vegetation encroachuilent and the growth of <br />mid-chamlel bars by disturbing vegetation establislunent within the active channel, including on <br />mid-chamlel bars, and on floodplain surfaces. The geomorphic effectiveness of high flows is a <br />22 <br />