My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Upper Los Pinos Water Quality Report
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Upper Los Pinos Water Quality Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2010 11:11:05 AM
Creation date
6/9/2008 3:57:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
hr_0007
Contract/PO #
PO 05-64
County
La Plata
Hinsdale
San Juan
Stream Name
Los Pinos River
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Sub-Basin
Upper San Juan 14080101
Water Division
7
Title
Water_Quality Data Synthesis for the Upper Los Pinos River Watershed, SW Colorado, and Suggestions for a Watershed Plan, 2005
Date
1/1/2005
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
Southwest Hydro-Logic
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Planning Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
water from the high-altitude lakes. Trend ~uialvsis of <br />the data using the Mum-ILendall test (Helsel and <br />Hirsh, 1992; Sahni and others, 2002) indicated that the <br />improving trends are significant. The causes for the <br />improving trends are unlino~~n; however, placement of <br />the time lines for the Clean Air Act and amendments <br />seems to have a relationship to the improving trends. <br />In particular, changes in pH over time seem to be <br />related to the time lines for the Clean Air Act and <br />amendments (fig. 7). The effects of atmospheric <br />deposition from coal-fired power plants is sometimes <br />described by changes in sulfate and nitrate (Turk and <br />others, 1993); however, there were no observed trends <br />for these parameters. <br />The Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) conducted a <br />~~-ater-quality study in the Vallecito Reservoir area <br />during 1992-9~ (Bureau of Reclamation, 1995). <br />Samples were collected from 72 surface- and ground- <br />water sites. Figure 8 shows all water-quality sites in <br />the Vallecito Reservoir area, ilicluding the BOR sites. <br />Water-quality parameters included in the BOR study <br />included total arsenic concentrations and fecal <br />colifonn counts (counts of fecal coliform bacterial <br />colonies after incubation at 3~°C for 24 hours). Total <br />arsenic concentrations were reported in water from 9 <br />sites (fig. 9). Total arsenic concentrations in surface- <br />water samples ranged from 2 to 3 ug/L; total arsenic <br />concentrations in ground-water samples ranged from ~ <br />to 44 ug/L (fig. 9). Positive fecal colifonn counts <br />were reported in water from 126 sites (fig. 10); twelve <br />of the positive counts were in water from wells. Fecal <br />colifonn counts ranged from < 3 to 4,600 col/100 mL <br />(colonies per 100 milliliters). The purpose of this <br />report is not to report specific locations of arsenic <br />concentrations and fecal coliform counts. The purpose <br />is to notify the citizens in the watershed that arsenic <br />concentrations and fecal coliform counts eiist in <br />~~-aters of the upper Los Pinos River watershed. <br />Water-quality data have been collected from Los <br />Pinos River upstream from the reservoir by the USGS, <br />U.S. Forest Service, Colorado River Watch, and the <br />Volunteer Lake Monitoring Program. Data have been <br />collected from Los Pinos River downstream from the <br />reservoir by the USGS, the Southern Ute Tribe. and <br />the Volunteer Lake Monitoring Program. A consistent <br />monitoi7ng program has not taken place for Los Pinos <br />River upstream and downstream from the reservoir: <br />hence, the anah~tical parameters and detection limits <br />vain by collection date a«d agency. The Missionan_- <br />Ridge Wildfire of 2002 may have impacted water- <br />qualit<- parameters in Los Pinos River do~~mstream <br />from the reservoir; however. there are not sufficient <br />data to describe and- such impacts. The available <br />water-quality data for Los Piiios River are shoe°n iii <br />figure 11. The time line of the Missiona~-~- Ridge wild- <br />fire is indicated. <br />The USGS has collected research watcr-qualit<- <br />data in streams and tributaries of the upper Los Pinos <br />River watershed. The data collected are related to the <br />occurrence of dissolved org~uiic carbon and its rela- <br />tionship to geologic setting. These data ~~-ere not <br />available to the public at the time of the writilig oftlus <br />report. <br />Vallecito Reservoir <br />Lakes and reservoirs may be classified <br />according to their biological productivity. <br />Oligotrophic lakes are relatively unproductive and <br />receive only small amounts of plant nutrients. <br />Eutrophic lakes, due to an overabundance of nutrients, <br />can produce algal gro«th and aquatic plants that <br />impart taste and odor problems in water supplies, <br />reduce transparency; and result in odorous scums. <br />Aquatic plants choke shallow water near the edge of a <br />lake, thus reducing the accessibility for recreation. <br />Normally-, lakes that show depletion of dissolved <br />oxygen in the bottom of the lake (hypoliinnion) during <br />thermal sti7-atification are classified as eutrophic, while <br />those that maintain high oz-ygen levels throughout the <br />rear are oligotrophic. Mesotrophic is often used to <br />classifi a moderately productive lake that is suitable <br />for recreation but less desirable as awatcr-supply <br />source. The major plant nutrients contributing tp <br />eutrophication are orthophosphate, inorganic nitrogen <br />(nitrate and a>mnonia), and carbon dioiide. Trace <br />nutrients include iron and silica, and organic <br />compounds (such as vitamins). Although not <br />universallT accepted. phosphorus may be the key <br />limiting factor for development of eutrophication <br />(Clark, Viessman, and Hammer, 1977). The major <br />physical factors that influence eutrophication include <br />temperature, light- residence times of the lake water, <br />and thermal stratification. Lakes thermally stratifi- <br />during «inter and suimner and circulate (overturn) <br />each spring and autumn. Figure 12 shows a schematic <br />of thermal stratification in a lake. <br />Water quality is directly affectcd by thermal <br />stratification. The epilimnion (fig. 12) supports <br />abundant algal growth, while the h~polimnion in <br />20 Water-Quality Data Synthesis for the Upper Los Pinos River Watershed, In cooperation with the Colorado Watershed Protection Fund and <br />Southwestern Colorado, and Suggestions for a Watershed Plan, 2005 the San Juan Resource Conservation and Development Council <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.