Laserfiche WebLink
remove the larger cobbles and facilitate grain-size testing. It is likely that <br />groundwater movement between the stream and underlying aquifer is inhibited by <br />t11e armor>11g of the streambed surface. <br />Sediment materials were described at the sites by t11e field geologist. Up to two <br />representative core intervals from each corellole were subnutted for geotechnical <br />testing to deterniuze the streambed sediment grauz-size distribution. A total of 175 <br />core samples were subnutted to Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc. of Parker, <br />Colorado, for geotechnical grain-size testing by the wet-sieve method following <br />ASTM D-422 and ASTM D-2217 (ASTM 2002, ASTM 1998). <br />2.3 streambed Vertical Hydraulic Gradient Testing <br />The vertical hydraulic gradient across t11e streambed was measured at eac11 test site at <br />a location near the center of the active charulel at each transect. Incases of a narrow <br />streambed, the vertical hydraulic gradient was measured upstream or downstream of <br />the core-11o1e testing locations to prevent interference by other testing and sampling. <br />A schematic diagram of the streambed vertical hydraulic gradient testing procedure is <br />provided in Figure 3. <br />At each location a piezometer was driven 3 ft into t11e streambed. This was done <br />immediately upon arrival at the site to allow the aquifer's water level to equilibrate as <br />long as possible before measurement (approximately 2 to 4 hours), which was <br />typically performed just before leaving t11e site. T11e piezometer consisted of a 1-inc11 <br />diameter steel pipe with a 4-inch wire-wrapped stainless steel screen and a drive <br />point at the bottom. The water level difference between the stream and aquifer was <br />determined by measuring the depth to water inside and outside t11e piezometer with <br />an electric water level probe suspended from the same measuring point. To <br />deternune the vertical hydraulic gradient across the streambed, the depth to water <br />inside the piezometer was t11en subtracted from t11e depth to water outside the <br />piezometer and t11e difference divided by 3 ft, the depth the piezometer screen extend <br />below the streambed. <br />At t11e four locations with DWR/ USGS gaging stations and adjacent SPDSS <br />monitoring wells (Henderson, Kersey, Balzac, and Julesburg), the aquifer water levels <br />and the stream stage height at the gages were recorded to supplement stream-aquifer <br />1ydraulic gradient measurements. Dur>11g Phase 2 of the SPDSS Task 35, monitoring <br />wells were installed and instrumented wit11 water level monitors adjacent to these <br />gaging stations. The measuring points for the gage and the monitoring well at each of <br />these locations were surveyed by a licensed surveyor. Groundwater level data were <br />collected using automated transducers and data loggers, while stream stage data were <br />obtained from the DWR. For t11e period of record during t11e Task 34 field activities, <br />approximately October and November of 2005, a head difference between the aquifer <br />and stream stage was calculated as t11e groundwater level elevation niulus the stream <br />stage elevation for each site. The results are presented in Section 3.4. <br />Fnlal T~zsl: 3~TM 06-28-07.doc <br />