My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task34-3_Phase 3_StreambedConductanceTesting
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task34-3_Phase 3_StreambedConductanceTesting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:16:47 AM
Creation date
6/9/2008 1:14:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 34.3 - Streambed Conductance Testing - Phase 3
Description
The objective of this Task 34 is to collect data needed to quantify the groundwater flux across the streambed in the South Platte River and significant tributaries.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
6/28/2007
DSS Category
Groundwater
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153953
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
CDM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
remove the larger cobbles and facilitate grain-size testing. It is likely that <br />groundwater movement between the stream and underlying aquifer is inhibited by <br />t11e armor>11g of the streambed surface. <br />Sediment materials were described at the sites by t11e field geologist. Up to two <br />representative core intervals from each corellole were subnutted for geotechnical <br />testing to deterniuze the streambed sediment grauz-size distribution. A total of 175 <br />core samples were subnutted to Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc. of Parker, <br />Colorado, for geotechnical grain-size testing by the wet-sieve method following <br />ASTM D-422 and ASTM D-2217 (ASTM 2002, ASTM 1998). <br />2.3 streambed Vertical Hydraulic Gradient Testing <br />The vertical hydraulic gradient across t11e streambed was measured at eac11 test site at <br />a location near the center of the active charulel at each transect. Incases of a narrow <br />streambed, the vertical hydraulic gradient was measured upstream or downstream of <br />the core-11o1e testing locations to prevent interference by other testing and sampling. <br />A schematic diagram of the streambed vertical hydraulic gradient testing procedure is <br />provided in Figure 3. <br />At each location a piezometer was driven 3 ft into t11e streambed. This was done <br />immediately upon arrival at the site to allow the aquifer's water level to equilibrate as <br />long as possible before measurement (approximately 2 to 4 hours), which was <br />typically performed just before leaving t11e site. T11e piezometer consisted of a 1-inc11 <br />diameter steel pipe with a 4-inch wire-wrapped stainless steel screen and a drive <br />point at the bottom. The water level difference between the stream and aquifer was <br />determined by measuring the depth to water inside and outside t11e piezometer with <br />an electric water level probe suspended from the same measuring point. To <br />deternune the vertical hydraulic gradient across the streambed, the depth to water <br />inside the piezometer was t11en subtracted from t11e depth to water outside the <br />piezometer and t11e difference divided by 3 ft, the depth the piezometer screen extend <br />below the streambed. <br />At t11e four locations with DWR/ USGS gaging stations and adjacent SPDSS <br />monitoring wells (Henderson, Kersey, Balzac, and Julesburg), the aquifer water levels <br />and the stream stage height at the gages were recorded to supplement stream-aquifer <br />1ydraulic gradient measurements. Dur>11g Phase 2 of the SPDSS Task 35, monitoring <br />wells were installed and instrumented wit11 water level monitors adjacent to these <br />gaging stations. The measuring points for the gage and the monitoring well at each of <br />these locations were surveyed by a licensed surveyor. Groundwater level data were <br />collected using automated transducers and data loggers, while stream stage data were <br />obtained from the DWR. For t11e period of record during t11e Task 34 field activities, <br />approximately October and November of 2005, a head difference between the aquifer <br />and stream stage was calculated as t11e groundwater level elevation niulus the stream <br />stage elevation for each site. The results are presented in Section 3.4. <br />Fnlal T~zsl: 3~TM 06-28-07.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.