My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Eagle River Inventory and Assessment (2)
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Eagle River Inventory and Assessment (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2010 11:11:04 AM
Creation date
6/9/2008 12:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
hr_0003b
County
Eagle
Pitkin
Stream Name
Eagle River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Sub-Basin
Eagle 14010003
Water Division
5
Title
Eagle River Inventory and Assessment - Executive Summary
Date
8/1/2005
Prepared For
Eagle River Watershed Council
Prepared By
Colorado State University
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Planning Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A comparison of instream flow rights with average monthly flows along the Eagle River main stem <br />indicated that (in most locations) the instream flow rights were set more than one standard deviation below <br />the average flow computed from post-transbasin diversion gage records for September to October and <br />February to March. At the Gypsum and Minturn gages, it appears that instream flows are set at levels that are <br />more than two standard deviations below recorded average flows. Thus, these rights are met the vast majority <br />of the time, especially in the case of winter flows. <br />Given the current administrative structure, instream flow rights generate a "call" on the Eagle River main <br />stem when (1) flow is more than a standard deviation below average post-diversion conditions, (2) departures <br />from instream flow levels are being monitored and reported to CWCB, (3) CWCB makes a "call" on the <br />river, and (4) the call halts diversions that are junior to the priority date of the instream flow right. A call by <br />the CWCB to protect an instream flow water right in the Eagle River rarely occurs. Instream flow rights are <br />protected in changes of water rights and plans for augmentation. An organized local effort to monitor <br />instream flows in the Eagle River watershed does not currently exist. The state instream flow monitoring <br />program is small (one person for the entire state) and suffers from lack of resources. <br />Most instream flow recommendations in Colorado are based on the R2CROSS methodology. Current <br />CWCB implementation of the R2CROSS methodology seeks to satisfy three established hydraulic criteria in <br />the summer, and two of the same three criteria in the winter based on field discharge measurement at 40- <br />250% of the recommended instream flow. We reviewed the original field forms describing the R2CROSS <br />analysis used to determine minimum flow recommendations. The results of this analysis for the Eagle River <br />main stem are summarized in Table ES.I. <br />Table ES.1: Summary of results of reviewing instream flow field forms for the Eagle River main stem. <br /> Discharge Discharge CDOW Rec. <br /> Igo. of Meeting Meeting ISF for May- Final ISF Right <br />Segment of eagle River Segment Transacts ~Jse~ Three Habitat Two Habitat Sept. /Oct.- for May-Sept. / <br />Main Stem Lem th to Set ISF Criteria Criteria Aril Oct.-A ril Nfotes <br />Homestake Creek to Cross 6 miles 1 82-85 cfs 20 cfs 25111 cfs 25/11 cfs ISF outside range of 0.4-2.SQ <br />Creek measured, Meets one of three <br /> criteria in winter and two of three <br />criteria in summer <br />Cross Creek to Gore Creek 4 miles 1 290 cfs 87-107 cfs 50120 cfs SO120 cfs ISF outside range of 0.4-2.SQ <br /> measured, Meets one of three <br /> criteria in winter and one of three <br />criteria in summer <br />Gore Creek to Lake Creek 10.1 miles no survey ? ? 85145 cfs 85135 cfs No survey located, winter flow <br /> available reduced from recommended 45 cfs <br /> to 35 cfs <br />Lake Creek to Brush Creek 20 miles 1 226 cfs 130 cfs 130/50 cfs 110/45 cfs Recommended summer /winter <br /> flow of 130/50 reduced to 110145 <br /> cfs, Decreed right meets one of <br /> three criteria in winter and one of <br /> three criteria in summer, Assumed <br /> Mannin n value <br />Brush Creek to Colorado 12.8 miles 1 135 cfs 92-108 cfs 130/50 cfs 130/50 cfs Top width = 100 ft yet average top <br />River width of 7 bankfull sections <br /> measured at Gypsum SWA = 252 <br /> ft, Meets one of three criteria in <br /> winter and two of three criteria in <br />summer <br />CDOW -Colorado Division of Wildlife; ISF -instream flow; cfs -cubic feet per second; Q-discharge; SWA -State Wildlife Area; ft -- feet <br />Although the Eagle River exhibits substantial variability in morphology and hydraulic geometry, the <br />length of river represented by a single transact (cross section) ranges from 4 to 20 miles. Excluding the Gore <br />to Lake Creek segment (for which field records were not obtained), instream flow recommendations for the <br />remaining 43 miles of the Eagle River main stem between Homestake Creek to Dotsero were based on <br />measurements at 4 locations using the single-transact R2CROSS method. Two of eight instream flow <br />quantities decreed for reviewed segments of the Eagle main stem meet recommended habitat criteria. <br />According to a study that is widely regarded as providing the scientific basis for R2CROSS, the single- <br />transect R2CROSS method used on the Eagle River main stem was to provide rapid and repeatable estimates <br />Eagle River Inventory and Assessment ES-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.