Laserfiche WebLink
failure of tactical projects to restore ecosystem amenities and ecological integrity warrants the initial <br />investment in examining these larger questions, Although the recommendations presented in the Eagle River <br />Inventory and Assessment inevitably fall short of providing comprehensive information on all processes and <br />potential projects, the focus on detecting system-level stressors and integration of existing knowledge is <br />requisite for building comprehensive and sustainable strategies to restore the integrity of the Eagle River <br />watershed, <br />ES.3 WATERSHED OVERVIEW, HISTORY, AND POLICY <br />Over the course of the project, CSU reviewed and compiled hundreds of documents. Previous reports <br />and existing data sources that played a critical role in developing the eagle River Inventory and Assessment <br />include the: 2002 Eagle River mater Quality Management Plan (Northwest Colorado Council of Governments <br />(NWCCOG), 2002), Eagle River Watershed Plan (1996), Eagle River Assembly (ERA), U.S. Geological <br />Survey (USGS) reports and water-quality database, Eagle Mine monitoring and analysis reports, instream flow <br />quantification field forms and related reports by the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) and <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), and numerous historical documents and photographs from the <br />Denver Public Library and other sources, In addition to a brief review of these documents, this report <br />provides a synopsis of watershed characteristics, abrief history of the Eagle River watershed, and a survey of <br />current policies relating to riparian zones and stormwater management. <br />ES.4 ANALYSIS OF WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS (THE AFFECTED <br />ENVIRONMENT) <br />ES.4.1 Land Use <br />GIS and aerial photograph analyses indicate that the most intense land use change is focused in or near <br />the riparian corridors of the main stem Eagle River and Gore Creek, despite small percentages of developed <br />land use in the overall watershed. For example, an analysis of land cover data suggests that total developed <br />land use in the Gore Creek watershed is approximately 2%. Developed land cover within 100 m and 30 m of <br />Gore Creek between the Black Gore confluence and the Eagle River is estimated at 7% and 35%, respectively. <br />Similar patterns exist in the Eagle main stem, particularly between Minturn and Edwards where basin <br />topography, development practicality, and human desires to be near the water place disproportionate <br />development pressures in alluvial valleys. Results of an analysis of the imperviousness of developed areas (an <br />often-cited indicator of stream health) revealed comparable trends. Future development will continue <br />increasing imperviousness as the population of Eagle County approaches anticipated growth of 75% <br />(Colorado Division of Local Government, 2003) over the next 25 years. These patterns are perhaps not <br />surprising but nonetheless underscore the added challenges surrounding management of impervious surfaces, <br />stormwater, and riparian zones in mountainous watersheds with rapidly growing population centers focused <br />in and near ecologically critical zones. <br />ES.4.2 Water Use <br />Consumptive use accounts f®r appr®ximately 10 t® I5% ®f the Eagle River's average annual yield <br />of 410,000 acre feet at the Gypsum g~ge~ 7Che greatest consumptive use in the basin results from <br />transmountain exports which account for 60°/® of consumptive use Irrigation is the second largest <br />consumptive use at approximately 32%, Domesticlmunicipal and reservoir evaporation uses are estimated at <br />3% and 4%, respectively. From 1985 to 1995, a shift from irrigation consumptive use to domestic <br />consumptive use was apparent, as was a 54% decrease in irrigation consumptive use. <br />Eagle River Inventory and Assessment ES-4 <br />