Laserfiche WebLink
to 1986. We analyzed data from USGS flow gages in stream and river segments with decreed instream flow <br />rights to (1) examine the frequency of flows below the instream flow rights, and (2) compare the instream <br />flow rights to the average and deviation of actual flows at different times of year. Of 6~ s~~m~n~s i~ ~h~ <br />Ea~l~ ~iv~r w~~~rsh~d with i~str~am £~ow r~~~ts, 47 ar~ u~~a~~d, a~d ~h~ ~~pnaini~~ s~~m~n~s ~av~ <br />~nstr~am flows ~~a~ ~r~ ~ot ~~t at wi~~ly vary~n~ f~~qu~r~c~~s. Nine of the 19 segments that have been <br />gaged for at least 10 years have instream flow rights that have not been met at least one time per year in each <br />year of the record since appropriation. <br />A comparison of instream flow rights with average monthly flows along the Eagle River main stem <br />indicated that (in most locations) the instream flow rights were set more than one standard deviation below <br />the average flow computed from post-transbasin diversion gage records for September to October and <br />February to March. At the Gypsum and Minturn gages, it appears that instream flows are set at levels that are <br />more than two standard deviations below recorded average flows. Thus, these rights are met the vast majority <br />of the time, especially in the case of winter flows. <br />Given the current administrative structure, instream flow rights generate a"call" on the Eagle River main <br />stem when (1) flow is more than a standard deviation below average post-diversion conditions, (2) departures <br />from instream flow levels are being monitored and reported to CWCB, (3) CWCB makes a"call" on the <br />river, and (4) the call halts diversions that are junior to the priority date of the instream flow right. A call by <br />the CWCB to protect an instream flow water right in the Eagle River rarely occurs. Instream flow rights are <br />protected in changes of water rights and plans for augmentation. An organized local effort to monitor <br />instream flows in the Eagle River watershed does not currently exist. The state instream flow monitoring <br />program is small (one person for the entire state) and suffers from lack of resources. <br />Most instream flow recommendations in Colorado are based on the R2CROSS methodology. Current <br />CWCB implementation of the R2CROSS methodology seeks to satisfy three established hydraulic criteria in <br />the summer, and two of the same three criteria in the winter based on field discharge measurement at 40- <br />250% of the recommended instream flow. We reviewed the original field forms describing the R2CROSS <br />analysis used to determine minimum flow recommendations. The results of this analysis for the Eagle River <br />main stem are summarized in Table ES.I. <br />Table ES.1: Summary of results of reviewing instream ~ow field forms for the Eagle River main stem. <br /> Dis~har~~ Discfl~arge CDOW Rec. <br /> l~oo ~f 1VI~~tin~ Meeting ~SF for IVIay- Firnal ~SF IZight <br />Se~~ent o~ ~a~le River Se~ment Trams~cts ~1s~~ ~'fl~ree Ha~itat Two Habitat Sept, I Oct.- ~or May-Se~t. I <br />Main S~en~ Let~ ~h to Set ISF Criteria Criteria A ril Oc~.-A r~l l~o~es <br />Homestake Creek to Cross 6 miles 1 82-85 cfs 20 cfs 2S111 cfs 2S111 cfs ISF outside range of 0.4-2.5Q <br />Creek measured, Meets one of three <br /> criteria in winter and two of three <br /> criteria in summer <br />Cross Creek to Gore Creek 4 miles 1 290 cfs 87-107 cfs 50I20 cfs 50I20 cfs ISF outside range of 0.4-2.SQ <br /> measured, Meets one of three <br /> criteria in winter and one of three <br />criteria in summer <br />Gore Creek to Lake Creek 101 miles no survey ? ? 8S145 cfs 8S135 cfs No survey located, winter flow <br /> available reduced from recommended 45 cfs <br /> to 35 cfs <br />Lake Creek to Brush Creek 20 miles 1 226 cfs 130 cfs 130/50 c~s 110145 cfs Recommended summer 1 winter <br /> flow of 130/50 reduced to 110145 <br /> cfs, Decreed right meets one of <br /> three criteria in winter and one of <br /> three criteria in summer, Assumed <br /> Manlun n value <br />Brush Creek to Colorado 12.8 miles 1 135 cfs 92-108 cfs 130150 cfs 130150 cfs Top width =100 ft yet average top <br />River width of 7 bankfull sections <br /> measured at Gypsum SWA = 252 <br /> ft, Meets one of three criteria in <br /> winter and two of three criteria in <br />summer <br />CDOW - Colorado Division of Wildlife; ISF - instream flow; cfs - cubic feet per second; Q- discharge; SWA - State Wildlife Area; ft -- feet <br />vi Eagle River Inventory and Assessment <br />