My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task89-2_CropLandUseClassificationProcedures_20060929
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task89-2_CropLandUseClassificationProcedures_20060929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:54:12 AM
Creation date
6/5/2008 9:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 89.2 - Crop and Land Use Classification Procedures for Year 2001
Description
This memorandum describes the activities conducted under Task 89: ‘Mapping of Irrigated Land Use and Irrigated Parcel Boundaries’ for year 2001 and complements the SPDSS Memoranda for Task 89.1 and Task 90.2. This memorandum also provides details on the methods used to conduct a number of Task 89 activities, including Task 89.3: Determine Irrigated Vs. Non-irrigated Lands, Task 89.4: Identify Crop Types In Each Polygon, Task 89.5: Review, Revision and Final Classification, and Task 89.6: Conduct Accuracy Assessment, as well as the results obtained from these activities for year 2001.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
9/29/2006
DSS Category
GIS
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153960
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO 89.2 <br /> 100% 1.00 <br /> 98% 0.98 <br /> 96% 0 <br />96 <br /> . ~ <br /> <br /> 94% 0 <br />94 ~ <br />~, . <br /> <br /> <br />3 92% 0.92 <br />~ x <br />Q 90% 0 <br />90 <br /> . ~, <br /> D <br />y 88% 0 <br />88 ~ <br /> . <br />> ~ <br />O <br />86% <br />0.86 ~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> 84% 0.84 '~ <br /> 82% 0 <br />82 <br /> . <br /> 80% 0 <br />80 <br /> Initial Crop First Crop Second Crop Final Crop . <br /> <br />Classification Classification Classification <br />Classification <br /> Refinement Refinement <br /> (Overall Accuracy 89.80% 91.50% 93.50% 95.90% <br /> +KIA 0.86 0.89 0.91 0.95 <br /> <br />Figure 18. Overall Accuracy and Kappa Index of Agreement for Iterations of Irrigated Crops Classification <br />3. Comments and Concerns <br />Due to the differing dates of satellite imagery collected for each of the five Landsat frames covering the <br />SPDSS, initial accuracy assessment were performed on each Landsat frame individually (Table D. 8). Of <br />the five Landsat frames within the SPDSS study area, frame 33/32 contains 89% of all irrigated acreage in <br />the South Platte river basin and was therefore considered representative of the South Platte River Basin <br />for reporting purposes in this memorandum. Therefore, both the irrigated lands and the crop type <br />accuracy assessment results presented in Appendix D correspond to the final products for Districts 1, 2, 3, <br />and 64 delivered on November 30, 2004 corresponding to Landsat frame 33/32. <br />The high accuracies achieved in the irrigated lands and irrigated crop classifications, 96 percent, and 95 <br />percent correspondingly, show the effectiveness of the classification procedures described in this <br />memorandum. Particularly important was the use of multitemporal Landsat data. In addition to this, the <br />irrigated lands classification benefited from a detailed photointerpretation and manual delineation of <br />irrigated parcel boundaries. Although labor intensive, this procedure in combination with the extensive <br />field verification campaign and meetings with water users yielded the high accuracy assessment obtained. <br />In the case of irrigated crops, the high accuracies obtained were possible in part through extensive <br />reference data collected throughout the SPDSS area, as well as rigorous and detailed error reduction <br />procedures during each step of this process. <br />Since the great majority of the reference data used in this project, for reasons explained in Section 2.4, <br />was data acquired from the FSA, the accuracy assessment procedures conducted are likely biased toward <br />a population consisting of valuable crops, especially in the irrigated crops classification. In the case of <br />the irrigated lands, although this bias still exists, the reference data obtained through photointerpretation <br />of dry land cover types in combination with the field verification campaign may have reduced the <br />magnitude of the bias towards FSA data. Nevertheless, information obtained from field campaign and <br />Page 27 of 45 ~R~versfde FecAnotogy, fnc. <br />4'JaYer Resources Errgi~ecr:np an~i CansuFlrnp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.