Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO 89.2 <br /> 100% 1.00 <br /> 98% 0.98 <br /> 96% 0 <br />96 <br /> . ~ <br /> <br /> 94% 0 <br />94 ~ <br />~, . <br /> <br /> <br />3 92% 0.92 <br />~ x <br />Q 90% 0 <br />90 <br /> . ~, <br /> D <br />y 88% 0 <br />88 ~ <br /> . <br />> ~ <br />O <br />86% <br />0.86 ~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> 84% 0.84 '~ <br /> 82% 0 <br />82 <br /> . <br /> 80% 0 <br />80 <br /> Initial Crop First Crop Second Crop Final Crop . <br /> <br />Classification Classification Classification <br />Classification <br /> Refinement Refinement <br /> (Overall Accuracy 89.80% 91.50% 93.50% 95.90% <br /> +KIA 0.86 0.89 0.91 0.95 <br /> <br />Figure 18. Overall Accuracy and Kappa Index of Agreement for Iterations of Irrigated Crops Classification <br />3. Comments and Concerns <br />Due to the differing dates of satellite imagery collected for each of the five Landsat frames covering the <br />SPDSS, initial accuracy assessment were performed on each Landsat frame individually (Table D. 8). Of <br />the five Landsat frames within the SPDSS study area, frame 33/32 contains 89% of all irrigated acreage in <br />the South Platte river basin and was therefore considered representative of the South Platte River Basin <br />for reporting purposes in this memorandum. Therefore, both the irrigated lands and the crop type <br />accuracy assessment results presented in Appendix D correspond to the final products for Districts 1, 2, 3, <br />and 64 delivered on November 30, 2004 corresponding to Landsat frame 33/32. <br />The high accuracies achieved in the irrigated lands and irrigated crop classifications, 96 percent, and 95 <br />percent correspondingly, show the effectiveness of the classification procedures described in this <br />memorandum. Particularly important was the use of multitemporal Landsat data. In addition to this, the <br />irrigated lands classification benefited from a detailed photointerpretation and manual delineation of <br />irrigated parcel boundaries. Although labor intensive, this procedure in combination with the extensive <br />field verification campaign and meetings with water users yielded the high accuracy assessment obtained. <br />In the case of irrigated crops, the high accuracies obtained were possible in part through extensive <br />reference data collected throughout the SPDSS area, as well as rigorous and detailed error reduction <br />procedures during each step of this process. <br />Since the great majority of the reference data used in this project, for reasons explained in Section 2.4, <br />was data acquired from the FSA, the accuracy assessment procedures conducted are likely biased toward <br />a population consisting of valuable crops, especially in the irrigated crops classification. In the case of <br />the irrigated lands, although this bias still exists, the reference data obtained through photointerpretation <br />of dry land cover types in combination with the field verification campaign may have reduced the <br />magnitude of the bias towards FSA data. Nevertheless, information obtained from field campaign and <br />Page 27 of 45 ~R~versfde FecAnotogy, fnc. <br />4'JaYer Resources Errgi~ecr:np an~i CansuFlrnp <br />