My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task89-2_CropLandUseClassificationProcedures_20060929
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task89-2_CropLandUseClassificationProcedures_20060929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:54:12 AM
Creation date
6/5/2008 9:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 89.2 - Crop and Land Use Classification Procedures for Year 2001
Description
This memorandum describes the activities conducted under Task 89: ‘Mapping of Irrigated Land Use and Irrigated Parcel Boundaries’ for year 2001 and complements the SPDSS Memoranda for Task 89.1 and Task 90.2. This memorandum also provides details on the methods used to conduct a number of Task 89 activities, including Task 89.3: Determine Irrigated Vs. Non-irrigated Lands, Task 89.4: Identify Crop Types In Each Polygon, Task 89.5: Review, Revision and Final Classification, and Task 89.6: Conduct Accuracy Assessment, as well as the results obtained from these activities for year 2001.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
9/29/2006
DSS Category
GIS
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153960
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO 89.2 <br />possible errors associated with spectral similarities between irrigated crops and other land cover types <br />(e.g., dry-land crops, riparian vegetation, urban areas, etc.). <br />In the second step, reference data collected from FSA and other sources was used to `train' the ERDAS <br />Imagine MLCS and produce a per pixel classification of crop types. For use in validation and QA/QC, a <br />series of experiments was conducted to evaluate the MLC classification against other classification <br />techniques found in peer-reviewed literature (for references, see SPDSS Memorandum 89.1). Among the <br />techniques evaluated were `Unsupervised Isodata", `Hybrid Unsupervised/Supervised' as well as `simple <br />decision rule' classifications using NDVI imagery and Tasseled Cap imagery. When compared to the <br />other classification techniques, the MLC consistently provided better results. In general, these results <br />were 5 to 10% more accurate than the other classifications. The MLC classification was iteratively <br />refined through signature analysis techniques and input from water users and other sources. <br />In the third step, post classification rules were applied to assign crop types to previously defined irrigated <br />parcels. These rules included the derivation of zonal statistics, such as area tabulation of crops and <br />majority fraction, as well as a measure of homogeneity per parcel. Additional rules applied also included <br />the use of parcel types and shapes (e.g., center pivots). Figure 13 illustrates the rule-based classification <br />process. These rule-based classifications were performed by querying parcels within ArcMap using rules <br />described below. <br />'-~~ ~} ` MLC classification <br /> <br />'~!--' and derived GIS data <br />~`.: <br /> <br /> Parcel attribute <br />_ <br />~_ , ~~ Zonal statistics table <br />t table <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />' ~ <br />Maj. <br />Crop Crop "' Frac. Homog. Crop <br />Parcel Type <br />Parcel Yp Yp l <br />T e 1 T e 2 "' 1.0 7 <br />... <br />10012 Grass <br /> <br />10012 6 0 ... ... 0.5 4 <br />i <br />Classification <br />10013 Small Grains <br />10013 1 7 ... ,,, 0.95 g <br />i • <br />rules ~ 10014 Corn <br /> <br />... , <br />10014 3 2 10 $ <br />i 10015 Alfalfa <br />10015 4 0 ... " <br />... ~ ... <br />I <br /> Irrigated crops <br />Irrigated parcel classification <br />data (per parcel) <br />Figure 13. Rule-Based Parcel Classification of Crop Types <br />5 The Maximum Likelihood Classifier MLC is based on the probability that a pixel belongs to a particular class. The basic <br />equation assumes that these probabilities are equal for all classes, and that the input bands have normal distribution. The <br />maximum likelihood classifier uses the Gaussian threshold stored in each class signature to determine if a given pixel falls within <br />the class or not. The threshold is the radius (in standard deviation units) of a hyperellipse surrounding the mean of the class in <br />feature space. If the pixel falls inside the hyperellipse, it is assigned to the class. The class bias (BIAS) is used to resolve overlap <br />between classes, and weights one class in favor of another. <br />Page 19 of 45 ~Rfversfde FecAnotogy, fnc. <br />4'JaYer Resources Errgi~ecr:np an~i CansuFlrnp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.