My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task2_07-1_WaterRightsDatabaseYear2Summary
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task2_07-1_WaterRightsDatabaseYear2Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2011 10:18:47 AM
Creation date
6/2/2008 12:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 2.07-1 - Water Rights Database - Year 2 Summary
Description
The purpose of this task memorandum is to document the water rights database task activities performed during Year 2.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
1/3/1997
DSS Category
HydroBase
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CRDSS database contains many data types not found in the Hydrobase design, <br />and the Hydrobase design also contains many data types not needed for <br />CRDSS, which were not included in the CRDSS database. The State does plan <br />at some point to build the Hydrobase design, so the consultant tried to make the <br />CRDSS database compatible with the Hydrobase design as much as practical. <br />The compatibility was limited by the schedule and funding available to the <br />consultant to resolve design and data issues. <br />To help maintain consistency with the State's Hydrobase design and to make <br />migration to the design easier, the consultant was asked to include all the State's <br />data found in the original dBase files directly associated with the data included in <br />the CRDSS database. <br />As the Year 2 project proceeded, a memorandum was written (to Ross Bethel <br />and Will Burt from Doug Greer and Larry Brazil, March 29, 1996) describing <br />differences in the designs at the entity level for both Hydrobase and the CRDSS <br />database. The design used in the Phase 2b project is essentially the design <br />delivered to the State at the end of Phase 2a with minor changes. <br />The activities under this subtask included completing the database design and <br />populating the database. The State's management team was instrumental in <br />designing the table structure that was ultimately found to be workable for the <br />CRDSS. All the data in the water rights database came from the State in <br />machine - readable form. The State was responsible for a quality assurance task, <br />and the consultant assumed that the State's data were correct as received. <br />However, the consultant did perform quality assurance checks during the loading <br />process. If any data issues were discovered, these issues were returned to the <br />State for resolution. <br />The database was populated according to the procedures outlined in Section <br />2.2.3 of the CRDSS Developers' Manual. The procedures briefly consist of <br />receiving the dBase files that have been checked by the State. The consultant <br />then parses the data in these files to the correct format to prepare them for <br />loading into the database. The data are then loaded into a temporary database <br />table prior to being loaded into the database to make sure that all the data meet <br />the constraints of the database and to allow manipulation through use of the <br />database system utility programs. Only once the data are checked and all data <br />records are accounted for are the records loaded into the permanent tables. A <br />number of quality assurance checks are performed before any data becomes <br />part of the CRDSS database. These checks are outlined below: <br />As related tables are populated, the integrity of the relationships among tables is <br />checked. It is important to ensure that the data are associated with correct values <br />used as keys in related tables. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.