My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task1_19-2_ConsensusProject
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task1_19-2_ConsensusProject
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2011 10:18:47 AM
Creation date
5/30/2008 3:55:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 1.19-2 - User Involvement - The Process of Reaching Consensus in California Water Management
Description
This memorandum and the Consensus Project: Performance Measures Report (WRMI 1994) and the South Florida Water District Technical Integration: Regulation, Permitting, Planning and Operations Report (WRMI 1993) are designed to introduce the participants in the CRDSS development process to similar efforts underway in California and Florida.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
1/9/1995
DSS Category
DMI Utilities
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
all parties. State and federal entities authorized to manage California water must seek to balance and <br />distribute the benefits and impacts of water use. <br />Need for Consensus <br />Technical analysis can determine the impacts of existing and proposed water management schemes. <br />Over the years, a number of highly sophisticated analytical tools have been developed independently, not <br />only by the government agencies responsible for water management, but also by other interested parties. <br />As a result of dispersed authority for decision-making and of the independent efforts toward the <br />development of analytical techniques, there are no standard methods of analysis for evaluating proposed <br />decisions. <br />This lack of agreement concerning the appropriate data and techniques to use for decision support has <br />caused much difficulty in implementing regulatory changes. <br />Water Resources Management, Inc. (WRMI) and the Natural Heritage Institute (NHI) are working on the <br />Consensus Project, a cooperative effort between the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). This project has begun to build broad-based support for a suite of <br />analytical tools and support data. The Consensus Project stems from the Central Valley Project <br />Improvement Act Section 3406(a). The CVPIA requires that the Secretary of the Interior ?... develop <br />readily useable and broadly available models and support data to evaluate the ecologic and hydrologic <br />effects of ... water facilities and systems ...? <br />The Consensus Project is aimed at building consensus on the types of analytical tools and other <br />techniques that may be developed, improved, and used to guide the future management of California's <br />water resources. Ultimately, the Consensus Project will pave the way for the development of a credible, <br />consistent set of tools to support regulatory and other management decisions in the Central Valley of <br />California. <br />The immediate goal of the project is to set specifications (and ultimately to design and implement) tools <br />that accomplish the following: <br />Ensure consistency of data and analysis <br />? <br />Enhance, through peer review, the credibility of the data and analytical tools in the system to all <br />? <br />stakeholders <br />Provide an effective mechanism for adding and improving data and analytical tools <br />? <br />Consensus Project Overview <br />To develop consensus, the Consensus Project first focuses on what measures are necessary to evaluate <br />the effectiveness of alternative management strategies. The measures include conformity with legal <br />requirements and other (practical) operational constraints that must be met by system operations and <br />modifications. The measures will also include the economic, social, and environmental benefits and <br />adverse impacts that affect those concerned with system operations. The benefits and impacts to be <br />maximized or minimized will be called operating objectives. Legal requirements usually specify <br />measurements that will determine whether the requirements have been met. However, benefits and <br />impacts often have no definite measures. Identifying legal requirements and potential ?performance <br />measures? for benefits and impacts is a crucial part of the Consensus Project. <br />2 <br />A275 01.09.95 1-19.2 Sheer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.