My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task2-09-15_WeatherStationReview_YampaWhiteBasins
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task2-09-15_WeatherStationReview_YampaWhiteBasins
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2011 10:18:46 AM
Creation date
5/29/2008 2:06:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 2.09-15 - Review of USRB Weather Station and Recommended New Stations for the Yampa-White River Basin
Description
In the Phase I CRDSS Task Memorandum 1.14-1, it was recommended that the weather station sites be checked for representativeness. This memorandum will serve to meet that recommendation as it pertains to the Yampa-White River.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
12/3/1996
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recommended changes to the weather stations used in CRDSS are based upon the following: <br />1.Analysis of the maximum, minimum a nd average temperatures, and precipitation <br />records for the period 1970-90. <br />2.Review of a map provided by Colorado St ate University's IDS group. The map shows <br />the locations of the weather stations and the irrigated areas in the Yampa-White River. <br />3.Review of the USGS topographic maps. <br />It is recommended that if the elevation of the irrigate d area is different than the elevation of the weather <br />station, the temperatures used to calculate consum ptive use be adjusted using appropriate adiabatic <br />lapse rates. <br />3.0RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS <br />The recommended changes for each hydrologic unit and county are summarized in Table 4 and <br />discussed in the following text. In hydrologic un its and counties where more than one weather station is <br />recommended, the weighting factor for each station was determined by the CSU IDS group using GIS <br />technology. <br />Hydrologic Unit 14040106, Moffat County <br />The USBR recommended changing from the Manila, Utah station to the Browns Park Refuge station <br />because the Browns Park station is closer. Based upon an analysis of precipitation, topography, and the <br />location of irrigated lands, this recommendation should be adopted. <br />Hydrologic Unit 14050001, Moffat County <br />The USBR recommends continuing to use the Craig station for this un it. Six weather stations were <br />considered for this unit: Craig, Hayden, Maybell, Ferndale Ranch, Great Divide, and Hamilton. <br />Temperature differences between Craig, Hayden, a nd Maybell are about what one would expect given <br />the elevation differences between the stations. Ferndale Ranch, Great Divide, and Hamilton are <br />precipitation data only weather stations. <br />Although the period of record for Ferndale Ranch and Great Divide are out side the study period, an <br />analysis of monthly precipitation found similarities in Craig and Ferndale Ranch. The Williams Fork <br />Mountains appear to produce local orographic effects, based on inspection of the NOAA weather atlas. <br />The precipitation at Hamilton (18.98 inches) seems more representative of the lands in the Williams <br />Fork drainage than the preci pitation at Craig (14.56 inches). <br />Based upon the location of the irrigated area with re spect to the weather stations and topography, the <br />precipitation and temperature data from the Craig st ation is recommended for lands in the Yampa River <br />and Fortification Creek drainage. Precipitation data from the Ham ilton station and temperature data <br />from the Craig station is recommended for lands in the Williams Fork drainage. <br />2 <br />12.3.96 12.09-15 - Walter <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.