Laserfiche WebLink
Recommended changes to the weather stations used in CRDSS are based upon the following: <br />1.Analysis of the maximum, minimum a nd average temperatures, and precipitation <br />records for the period 1970-90. <br />2.Review of a map provided by Colorado St ate University's IDS group. The map shows <br />the locations of the weather stations and the irrigated areas in the Yampa-White River. <br />3.Review of the USGS topographic maps. <br />It is recommended that if the elevation of the irrigate d area is different than the elevation of the weather <br />station, the temperatures used to calculate consum ptive use be adjusted using appropriate adiabatic <br />lapse rates. <br />3.0RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS <br />The recommended changes for each hydrologic unit and county are summarized in Table 4 and <br />discussed in the following text. In hydrologic un its and counties where more than one weather station is <br />recommended, the weighting factor for each station was determined by the CSU IDS group using GIS <br />technology. <br />Hydrologic Unit 14040106, Moffat County <br />The USBR recommended changing from the Manila, Utah station to the Browns Park Refuge station <br />because the Browns Park station is closer. Based upon an analysis of precipitation, topography, and the <br />location of irrigated lands, this recommendation should be adopted. <br />Hydrologic Unit 14050001, Moffat County <br />The USBR recommends continuing to use the Craig station for this un it. Six weather stations were <br />considered for this unit: Craig, Hayden, Maybell, Ferndale Ranch, Great Divide, and Hamilton. <br />Temperature differences between Craig, Hayden, a nd Maybell are about what one would expect given <br />the elevation differences between the stations. Ferndale Ranch, Great Divide, and Hamilton are <br />precipitation data only weather stations. <br />Although the period of record for Ferndale Ranch and Great Divide are out side the study period, an <br />analysis of monthly precipitation found similarities in Craig and Ferndale Ranch. The Williams Fork <br />Mountains appear to produce local orographic effects, based on inspection of the NOAA weather atlas. <br />The precipitation at Hamilton (18.98 inches) seems more representative of the lands in the Williams <br />Fork drainage than the preci pitation at Craig (14.56 inches). <br />Based upon the location of the irrigated area with re spect to the weather stations and topography, the <br />precipitation and temperature data from the Craig st ation is recommended for lands in the Yampa River <br />and Fortification Creek drainage. Precipitation data from the Ham ilton station and temperature data <br />from the Craig station is recommended for lands in the Williams Fork drainage. <br />2 <br />12.3.96 12.09-15 - Walter <br />