Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 2. <br />Estimated Livestock Per Hydrologic Unit for Each Type for 1985-1990, Using the <br />Percentage in the Basin. <br />County 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 <br />(% of county in the basin) <br />Livestock Type Livestock Livestock Livestock Livestock Livestock Livestock <br />Number Number Number Number Number Number <br />Garfield (2 %) <br />C attle780800821821820820 <br />H ogs1098111316 <br />S heep434408381385388391 <br />Moffat (72%) <br />C attle190281925019472199792048620993 <br />H ogs899398100103105 <br />S heep517774731142846485455424559944 <br />Rio Blanco (10%) <br />C attle357235723571353434963458 <br />H ogs999131620 <br />S heep334934443538356235863610 <br />Routt (89%) <br />C attle2972728646275662777612795628151 <br />H ogs128117106114122130 <br />S heep223712365224932269962905931122 <br />TABLE 3. <br />Summary Table for Livestock Consumptive Use (acre-ft) <br />County 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 Average <br />(% of county in the basin) <br />Garfield (2%) 10101010101010 <br />Moffat (72%) 329322314333351370337 <br />Rio Blanco (10%) 48484848474748 <br />Routt (89%) 383374365372379385376 <br />Basin Total 770754737762787812770 <br />01.21.96 5 02.09-12 IDS/CSU <br />