My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task2-09-11_OtherUsesCULosses_WhiteBasin
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task2-09-11_OtherUsesCULosses_WhiteBasin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2011 10:18:46 AM
Creation date
5/29/2008 1:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 2.09-11 - Consumptive Use Model - Non-Irrigation (Other Uses) Consumptive Uses and Losses in the White River Basin
Description
This task memorandum formalizes the computation of non-irrigation categories such as livestock, stockpond, municipal, thermal electric, mineral resource, export, fish and wildlife, and recreation categories for the CRDSS consumptive use (CU) in the White River Basin for calendar years 1985 to 1990.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
1/21/1997
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CRDSS <br />TASK MEMORANDUM 2.09-11 <br />Consumptive Use Model <br />Non-Irrigation (Other Uses) Consumptive Uses and Losses <br />in the White River Basin <br />1.0 ISSUE <br />This task memorandum formalizes the computation of non-irrigation categories such as livestock, <br />stockpond, municipal, thermal electric, mineral res ource, export, fish and wildlife, and recreation <br />categories for the CRDSS consumptive use (CU) in the White River Basin for calendar years 1985 <br />to 1990. These categories are the same as those included in the USBR Colorado River System <br />Consumptive Uses and Losses Report (USBR, 1991) produced every five years. <br />2.0 DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS <br />The estimation of non-irrigation consumptive uses and losses from the entire White River basin can <br />be performed either by county (Garfield, Moffat and Rio Blanco) or by hydrologic unit HUC sub- <br />basin (14050005, 14050006 and 14050007). The US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) used the <br />intersection of counties and Hydrologic Units as the subdivisions for the crop consumptive use in its <br />Colorado River System Consump tive Uses and Losses Report, 1981-1985 (USBR, 1991), but for <br />some of the other uses (e.g. thermoelectric, mine ral) they used either county or HUC depending on <br />the available data. <br />To preserve consistency with these published repor ts and the units of the source data, other use data <br />are reported in Hydrologic Units, County (calculated) , or the intersection of County and Hydrologic <br />Unit. County data are determined based on GIS data showing the percentage of each County <br />contained in the White River Basin. <br />2.1 Livestock <br />As in (USBR, 1991) three types of live stock are included: cattle, sh eep and hogs. Table 1 shows the <br />average daily water consumption of each livestock type. <br />For the years 1985 to the present, the County Agri cultural Statistics (CAS) no longer reports the <br />number of livestock by county, instead records th is information for the entire state of Colorado. <br />Therefore, the US Census of agriculture was used. <br />This census is conducted every five years. The census data for 1982, 1987, and 1992 were used. <br />These data can be obtained from the US Census world wide web page at <br />http://sasquatch.kerr.orst.edu/ag-stateis.html. <br />Using linear interpolation, values for the years 1985-1990 were calculated. The values for each <br />county were distributed by s ub-basin based on the area (obtai ned from GIS) of each county <br />contained in the White River Basin (Ga rfield 13%, Moffat 10%, and Rio Blanco 90%). <br />Table 2 shows the number of livestock type by County, and Table 3 shows a summary of the <br />estimated consumptive uses for 1985-1990. <br />1 <br />01.21.97 02.09-11 CSU/IDS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.