My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task2-09-10_OtherUsesCULosses_UpperColoBasin
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task2-09-10_OtherUsesCULosses_UpperColoBasin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2011 10:18:46 AM
Creation date
5/29/2008 1:44:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 2.09-10 - Consumptive Use Model - Non-Irrigation (Other Uses) Consumptive Uses and Losses in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Description
This task memorandum formalizes the computation of non-irrigation categories such as livestock, stockpond, municipal, thermal electric, mineral resource, export, fish and wildlife, and recreation categories for the CRDSS consumptive use (CU) in the Upper Colorado River Basin for calendar years 1985 to 1990.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
1/21/1997
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CRDSS <br />TASK MEMORANDUM 2.09-10 <br />Consumptive Use Model <br />Non-Irrigation (Other Uses) Consumptive Uses and Losses <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />1.0 ISSUE <br />This task memorandum formalizes the computati on of non-irrigation categories such as livestock, <br />stockpond, municipal, thermal electric, mineral res ource, export, fish and wildlife, and recreation <br />categories for the CRDSS consumptive use (CU) in the Upper Colorado River Basin for calendar <br />years 1985 to 1990. These categories are the same as those included in the USBR Colorado River <br />System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report (USBR, 1991) produced every five years. <br />2.0 DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS <br />The estimation of the non-irrigation consumptive uses and losses from the entire Colorado Main <br />Stem can be performed either by county (Eagle , Garfield, Grand, Mesa, Pitkin, Routt, and Summit) <br />or by hydrologic unit HUC (14010001, 14010002, 14010003, 14010004, 14010005 and 14010006). <br />The US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) used the intersection of counties and Hydrologic Units as <br />the subdivisions for the crop consumptive use in its Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and <br />Losses Report, 1981-1985 (USBR, 1991), but for some of the other uses (e.g. thermoelectric, <br />mineral) they used either county or HUC depending on the available data. <br />To preserve consistency with these published reports and the units of the source data, other use data <br />are reported in Hydrologic Units , County (calculated),or the inte rsection of County and Hydrologic <br />Unit. <br />2.1 Livestock <br />As in (USBR, 1991) three types of livestock are included: cattle, sheep and hogs. Table 1 shows the <br />average daily water consumption of each livestock type. <br />For the years 1985 to the present, the County Agri cultural Statistics (CAS) no longer reports the <br />number of livestock by county, instead it recorded this information for the entire state of Colorado. <br />Therefore, the US Census of agriculture was used. <br />This census is conducted every five years. The census data for 1982, 1987, and 1992 were used, <br />these data can be obtained from the US Census world wide web page at <br />http://sasquatch.kerr.orst.edu/ag-stateis.html. <br />Using linear interpolation, values for the years 1985-1990 were calculated. The calculated numbers <br />for each county were distributed by sub-basin ba sed on the area (obtained from GIS) of each county <br />contained in the Upper Colorado River Basin (Eagle 100%, Garfield 85% , Grand 100%, Mesa 54%, <br />Pitkin 100%, Routt 11%, and Summit 100%). <br />Table 2 shows the number of livestock type by county, and Table 3 shows a summary of the <br />estimated consumptive use for 1985-1990. <br />1 <br />01.21.97 2.09-10 IDS/CSU <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.