My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task1_14-22_IrrigationCULosses_GunnisonBasin
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task1_14-22_IrrigationCULosses_GunnisonBasin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2011 10:18:50 AM
Creation date
5/29/2008 11:35:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 1.14-22 - Consumptive Use Model - Irrigation Consumptive Uses and Losses in the Gunnison River Basin
Description
This task memorandum formalizes the verification/implementation of the CRDSS consumptive use (CU) model for the Gunnison River basin as a prototype.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
1/9/1995
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Gunnison
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Data Set 3 - Alfalfa-short and Pasture-short Crops Considered <br />Using the crop-aggregated soil combinations of the second data set, parts of alfalfa and pasture areas are <br />assigned water short. These areas are calculated using a ratio (water short area/total area) that the USBR <br />adopted in the Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, 1981-85. The ratio is <br />constant for each subarea for each crop (alfalfa, pasture) as shown in Table 4, and is applied to all years <br />in the report. <br />The length of the growing seasons for alfalfa-short and pasture-short are assumed to be equal to the <br />average of the values that are reported in the USBR Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and <br />Losses Report, 1981-85. Similarly, the specified planting and cutoff dates in the report are averaged in <br />each subarea to obtain equivalent numbers for the 1985-90 report. Thus, each crop combination is <br />assigned a single planting and cutoff date for all years, though these numbers can be varied in each year. <br />Figure 5 shows the total annual IWR for the whole Gunnison River basin computed using the two forms <br />of the SCS Blaney-Criddle ET estimation method (with and without enhancements). As expected, the 6- <br />year average annual IWR is lower than the previous data set runs, i.e. 326,140 acre-ft (8.3 percent lower) <br />and 371,150 acre-ft (7.4 percent lower) for SCS Blaney-Criddle with and without enhancements, <br />respectively. <br />The estimated IWR of the first two runs can be viewed as the total IWR in the Gunnison River basin <br />without any water supply limitations. The third data run considered the short areas, and therefore the <br />IWR might be closer to the actual water use. <br />Figure 6 shows the 6-year average annual consumptive use by subarea. The highest volumetric water use <br />by subarea, by county, and by HU is in Montrose6 (99,840 and 109,240 acre-ft), Delta (132,940 and <br />147,770 acre-ft), and HU14020006 (116,030 and 129,500 acre-ft). <br />In the USBR Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, 1981-85 , the determination <br />of alfalfa-short and pasture-short areas has become a prerequisite of consumptive use calculation. This is <br />because the XCONS2 program does not automatically account for water supply information in the <br />calculations. With the CRDSS enhancements, o ne of which is the incorporation of the water supply <br />information, the determination of alfalfa-short and pasture-short areas is a product rather than a <br />prerequisite of the consumptive use calculations. <br />A more detailed tabular result is included in Section 4.0 <br />Data Set 4 - New Set of Weather Station Weights <br />The first three data sets were run using the USBR recommended set of weather station weights. The <br />fourth scenario uses all the data from the third data set except the set of weather stations and weights. <br />Modification of the weather stations used by the USBR are proposed in Task Memorandum 1.14-18, and <br />the new weights are computed using GIS. <br />Figure 7 shows the annual IWR for the whole Gunnison River basin computed using the two forms of the <br />SCS Blaney-Criddle ET estimation method (with and without enhancements). The 6-year average <br />annual IWR is higher than the previous data set run, i.e. 335,710 acre-ft (2.9 percent higher) and 380,500 <br />acre-ft (2.5 percent higher) for SCS Blaney-Criddle with and without enhancements, respectively. <br />Figure 8 shows the 6-year average annual IWR by subarea. The change in the set of weights affected <br />4 <br />A275 01.0995 1.14-22 Manguerra <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.