My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task1_14-5_CUModelsInShortList
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task1_14-5_CUModelsInShortList
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2011 10:18:49 AM
Creation date
5/29/2008 8:38:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 1.14-5 Consumptive Use Models - Consumptive Use Models Included in the Short List
Description
The purpose of this task memorandum is to describe the reasons for including consumptive use models in the “short list.” The short list was composed of five models that went through a more rigorous evaluation phase.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
1/9/1995
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Contract/PO #
C153658, C153727, C153752
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Riverside Technology inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Basin <br />Basin was developed by the USBR, Nebraska and K ansas projects office, Grand Island, Nebraska; the <br />technical contact is L. Mylter. The model was written in FORTRAN on a UNIX workstation. This <br />model uses SCS Blaney-Criddle and the Jensen Haise methods to estimate monthly ET. <br />The primary design purpose for this model is to estimate farm and project delivery water requirements <br />and ground water table recharge. The estimated monthly CIR for a specified area is calculated by <br />considering the infiltration, the soil moisture budget, deep percolation, and monthly rainfall. Infiltration <br />soil curves should be developed using rainfall versus runoff data for the specified area. <br />The program was recently converted from an IBM-compatible PC-based FORTRAN version to a UNIX <br />workstation version. Because of this recent conversion, the documentation is poor. Since the model only <br />contains the SCS Blaney-Criddle method (Jensen-Haise is not being considered for this project), it was <br />determined that XCONS2 provided this capability. Also, the model contains additional components that <br />are not required for this project (e.g., ground water recharge). Therefore, Basin was excluded from the <br />short list. <br />CRPSM and CROPWAT <br />CRPSM and CROPWAT were developed at Utah State University by Dr. Robert Hill; the models are not <br />in the public domain. These models were written in FORTRAN and can be run on an IBM-compatible <br />PC. These models use five methods to estimate daily ET. These methods are the 1982 Kimberly- <br />Penman, FAO-24 Blaney-Criddle, Jensen-Haise, Hargraves, and Pan Evaporation methods. The models <br />estimate CIR by including changes in the soil moisture content, and they treat any rainfall as effective <br />rainfall in the calculation of the CIR estimate. <br />The difference between CRPSM and CROPWAT is the method of calculating the crop coefficients. The <br />CRPSM model estimates crop yield as a function of plant ET during the growing season. For that <br />reason, a separate function is required to calculate each soil evaporation coefficient and crop <br />transpiration coefficient in CIR estimation. In the CROPWAT model, the FAO crop coefficients are <br />used for CIR estimation. Neither model provides a method for calculating effective precipitation. <br />The testing of these programs took some time because of problems in developing and understanding the <br />format of the input files. The model CRPSM has a user manual, but the documentation for the <br />CROPWAT model is very limited. Dr. Hill was available to discuss questions regarding the input data <br />and model capabilities. The source code for the models was not available during testing because the <br />models are not in the public domain. Dr. Hill, however, is willing to sell the source code for a few <br />hundred dollars (~$350-$400) and would require a license agreement. The license agreement in <br />preliminary discussions seemed to be flexible, although Dr. Hill would like to be involved to some <br />degree in the modifications to the code or at least be notified of the changes to the code. These models <br />proved to be good choices for the short list; however, the fact that the models are not in the public <br />domain was considered a disadvantage. If, at some point, a combination equation is desired, the fact that <br />SMB and its developer (Ivan Walter) is a member of the CRDSS team makes the selection of SMB a <br />better choice for CRDSS. <br />2 <br />A275 01.09.95 1.14-5 CSU IDS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.