My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task56_ConveyanceandApplicationEfficiencies
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task56_ConveyanceandApplicationEfficiencies
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:30:54 AM
Creation date
5/27/2008 10:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 56 - Conveyance and Application Efficiencies
Description
This memorandum describes the approach and results obtained under Task 56 - Conveyance and Application Efficiencies. This task includes an estimation of both ditch system conveyance and maximum application (on-farm) efficiencies likely to be experienced in the South Platte basin, plus a recommendation on efficiencies to use for the historic consumptive use analyses.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
4/22/2008
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153954
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conveyance Loss versus Main Canal Length <br />Most of the ditch company representatives provided loss percentages for the irrigation <br />season. As shown in Table B-1, reported conveyance losses for the large ditch systems <br />range from 10 to 50 percent, with an average of 23 percent. Figure B-1 shows the <br />estimated ditch losses as a fraction of the total river head gate diversion versus the length <br />of the main canal. An attempted relationship between ditch loss and main canal length <br />resulted in a low coefficient of determination (r2), which indicates minimal correlation <br />between the data. However, the data indicates that, in general, as canal length increases, <br />ditch losses increase. <br />0.60 - <br />~. <br />>_ 0.50 - <br />0 <br />H <br />o ~ 0.40 - <br />~ o <br />o <br />~. <br />U ~ <br />~. <br />~, ~ 0.30 - <br />~ ~ <br />~ ~ <br />O ~ <br />~ x 0.20 - <br />U <br />T <br />N <br />7 <br />0 0.10 - <br />C..) <br />0.00 - <br />Figure B-1 <br />Conveyance Loss versus Canal Length <br />y = 0.1225x°.146 <br />~ ~ ~ <br />R~ = 0.064 <br />• ~• ~ <br />0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 <br />Canal Length (miles) <br />In some instances, it was unclear whether the ditch system losses provided by the ditch <br />companies were for the main canal only, or included parts of the lateral delivery system. <br />In addition, some of the main canals become laterals and, therefore, there was uncertainty <br />involved with measuring the main canal lengths. <br />Conveyance Loss versus Canal Capacity <br />Canal capacity often provides a good basis for estimating conveyance loss, since it can be <br />representative of overall system size as well as the wetted perimeter. Figure B-2 <br />illustrates conveyance loss versus the flow capacity of the ditch. The data illustrated in <br />Figure B-2 indicate, that, in general, irrigation ditches with greater flow capacities may <br />have greater ditch losses. However, the coefficient of determination (r2) indicates that <br />there is minimal correlation between the two variables. In addition, many of the flow <br />capacities for the canals used in the analysis were obtained from HydroBase, which <br />reports capacities based on total decreed water rights or historic maximum daily <br />discharges, either of which may not accurately represent the current ditch configuration. <br />Page B4 of B9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.