Laserfiche WebLink
1.1 Combine Climate Stations <br />There are ten sets of key climate stations listed in Table 1 for which the physical station location <br />moved during the SPDSS study period and/or combining the data for the two stations was <br />determined to be appropriate. The two station locations were compared in terms of distance and <br />elevation differences. The combined stations, with the difference in elevation and distances, are <br />listed below in Table 2. <br />Table 2 <br />Combined Key Climate Stations <br />Independent Time Series (Old Station) Dependent Time Series (New Station) <br /> <br />Station Name and ID Period of <br /> <br />Record <br />Station Name and ID Period of <br /> <br />Record 1 <br />Distance Elevation <br />Differences ~ <br />Akron 1 N (114) 1937 - 1999 Akron 4 E (109) 1918 - 2003 3.7 miles 120 feet <br />Allenspark 2 NNW (183) 1948 - 1993 Allenspark 1 NW (185) 1994 - 2003 1.4 miles 180 feet <br />Estes Park (2759) 1948 - 2001 Estes Park 1 SSE (2761) 2001 - 2003 n/a s 305 feet <br />Evergreen 2 SW (2795) <br />(No Temperature Data) 1948 - 1951 Evergreen (2790) 1961 - 2003 21 miles 310 feet <br />Greeley (3546) 1948 - 1967 Greeley UNC (3553) 1967 - 2003 1.4 miles 60 feet <br />Edgewater (2557) 1948 - 1962 Lakewood (4762) 1962 - 2003 1.8 miles 190 feet <br />Kauffman 4 SSE (4460) 1948 - 1987 New Raymer 21 N (5934) 1987 - 2003 91 miles 70 feet <br />Parker 6 E (6326) 1948 - 1997 Parker 2 N (6323) 1997 - 2003 5.4 miles 400 feet <br />Red Feather Lakes 2 SE (6925) <br />Red Feather Lakes 6 (6930) 1948 - 1990 <br />1959 - 1962 Red Feather Lakes (6921) 1991 - 1997 2.1 miles <br />39 miles 135 feet <br />560 feet <br />Sedgwick (7513) 1948 - 2003 Sedgwick 5 S (7515) 1958 - 2003 4.7 miles 400 feet <br />Notes: i Distances based on CDSS Climate Station GIS coverage <br />~ Elevation differences based on data from HydroBase <br />s No GIS coverage of Estes Park 1 SSE <br />Data from the combined stations were graphed using cumulative mass diagrams to check for <br />consistency and to verify that combining the stations was a valid approach (Appendix A). The <br />fitted lines show no break in the slope of the cumulative precipitation, indicating that there are no <br />major differences between data collected from the two locations. This confirms it is appropriate <br />to combine these stations. <br />The combined data sets were created using the following TSTooI commands: <br />1. setOutputPeriod -Extends the dependent time series (new station) to include the period <br />of the independent time series (old station). <br />2. fillFromTS -Copies data from the independent time series to replace missing values in <br />the dependent time series. <br />Task 53_2.doc 6 of 17 <br />