Laserfiche WebLink
replace evaporation of water that was stored out of priority, for example water stored in an un- <br />lined gravel pit, then 70 percent of the total precipitation is considered effective and applied as a <br />credit. According to the State Engineer's Office, this assumes that 70 percent of precipitation on <br />the reservoir site was previously consumed by native vegetation, and 30 percent contributed to <br />stream flow. (Note that this 70 percent factor should not be confused with the 0.70 pan <br />coefficient generally applied to pan evaporation estimates to get gross evaporation estimates.) <br />Denver Water and the Bureau of Reclamation, however, are calculating amass-balance of <br />reservoir inflows and outflows; therefore they consider the full precipitation in their net reservoir <br />evaporation calculation. Similarly for the SPDSS Water Budget and Surface Water modeling <br />efforts, the full precipitation should be considered in the net evaporation calculation. Due to <br />inconsistencies noted, the reservoir evaporation rates from the Denver Water and NCWCD <br />models were not used. <br />In the absence of site-specific data, the following consistent method was adopted for the entire <br />basin, as explained in detail below: <br />1. Determine average annual gross evaporation based on NOAA publications <br />2. Determine average annual precipitation based on Colorado Climate Center publications <br />3. Distribute annual gross evaporation to monthly using State Engineer's Office procedure <br />4. Distribute annual precipitation to monthly using local climate station data <br />5. Estimate average net monthly evaporation rates by subtracting precipitation from gross <br />evaporation <br />Steps 1 and 2: Determine average annual gross evaporation and average annual precipitation <br />The CDSS GIS coverage includes the following gross evaporation and precipitation shape files <br />based on average annual estimates: <br />• NOAA Free Water Surface Evaporation published in June 1982, based on a 1956 <br />through 1970 study period. <br />• Precipitation Isohyetal Map published by the Colorado Climate Center, based on a <br />report titled "Analysis of Colorado Average Annual Precipitation for the 1951-1980 <br />Period". <br />These files were used to develop average annual gross reservoir evaporation and total <br />precipitation estimates for each water district or sub-district shown in Figure 1 above. <br />Step 3: Distribute annual gross evaporation to monthly <br />Average annual gross reservoir evaporation estimates developed in Step 1 above were distributed <br />monthly with the percentages used by the State Engineer's Office (presented by Wolfe and <br />Stenzel at a 1995 ET and Irrigation Efficiency Seminar and summarized in a paper titled <br />"Evaporation"). There are two average monthly distributions; one for below 6,500 feet and one <br />for above 6,500 feet above mean sea level (Table 2). The below 6,500 feet distribution was used <br />for Water Districts 2, 64, and the lower portions of Water Districts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. The <br />above 6,500 feet distribution was used for the upper portions of Water Districts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, <br />9 and Water Districts 23, 47, 48, 76, and 80. The resulting average monthly gross reservoir <br />evaporation estimates are provided in Table 3. <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />