Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Levee Embankments <br /> <br />Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee systems <br /> <br /> <br />9,' <br />No riprap displacement or stone degradatio could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of <br />channel banl,- Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present <br /> <br />For use during <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />Riprap <br />Revetments & <br />Bank <br />Protection <br /> <br />Minor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity <br />of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate <br /> <br />herbicide. <br /> <br />Significant riprap displacement, exposure of bedding, or stone degradation observed. Scour <br />U activity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing <br />turbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses. <br />NfA There is no riprap protecting this feature ofthe system, or riprap is discussed in another section. <br />A Existing <br /> <br />M <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />is prop_erly maintained, undamaged, and clearly visible. <br /> <br />MiAor-revetment displacement or deteriorntion that !Ioes notpos~anjmmediate tbreauo t1K <br />integrity of the levee. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate <br />herbicide. <br /> <br />revetment _protection <br /> <br />Revetments <br />than <br /> <br />-<lthe: <br />Riprap <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Significant revetment displacement, deterioration, or exposure of bedding observed. Scour activity <br />is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing turbulence or <br />shoaling. Revetment protection is hidden by dense brush and trees <br />There are no such revetments protecting this feature of the system. <br /> <br />M <br /> <br />U <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />Toe drainage systems and pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR system stability <br />during high water functioned properly during the last flood event and no sediment is observed in <br />horizontal system (if applicable). Nothing is observed which would indicate that the drainage <br />systems won't function properly during the next flood, and maintenance records indicate regular <br />cleaning. Wells have been pumped tested within the past 5 years and documentation is provided. <br /> <br />NfA <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />4. Undersecpage <br />ReliefWellsJ <br />Toe Drainage <br /> <br />Toe drainage systems or pressure rei ief wells are damaged and may become clogged if they are not <br />repaired. Maintenance records are incomplete or indicate irregular cleaning and pump testing. <br />Toe drainage systems or pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR system stability <br />during flood events have fallen into disrepair or have become clogged. No maintenance records. <br />No documentation of the required pump testing. <br />There are no reliefwellsf toe drainage systems along this component of the FDR system. <br /> <br />M <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />Systems <br /> <br />No evidence or history of unrepaired seepage, saturated areas, or boils. <br />Evidence or history of minor unrepaired seepage or small saturated areas at <br />toe but not on the landward slope of levee. No evidence of soil transport. <br />Evidence or histo <br /> <br />NfA <br />A <br /> <br />5. Seepage <br /> <br />or beyond the landside <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />Levee Embankments <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />FDR = Flood Damage Reduction <br /> <br />or boils. <br />Applicable. <br /> <br />Flood Damage Reduction System <br />Inspection Report <br /> <br /> <br />N/A = Not <br /> <br />M <br /> <br />U <br />M = Minimally Acceptable; <br /> <br />Key: A = Acceptable. <br /> <br />US Army Corps <br />of Engineers.. <br />