My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11727
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1100
>
FLOOD11727
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:23:54 AM
Creation date
5/19/2008 2:17:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
221
County
El Paso
Community
Manitou Springs
Basin
Arkansas
Title
FIS - Manitou Springs
Date
8/1/1983
Designation Date
1/5/1984
Prepared For
Manitou Springs
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />this concept, the area of the lOO-year flood is divided into a <br />floodway and a floodway fringe. The floodway' is the channel of <br />a stream plus any adjacent flood plain areas that must be kept <br />free of encroachment in order that the lOO-year flood may be carried <br />without substantial increases in flood heights. Minimum standards <br />of the Federal Emergency Management Agency li.mit such increases <br />in flood heights to 1.0 foot, provided that hazardous velocities <br />are not produced. The floodways in this report are presenteo <br />to local agencies as minimum standards that can be adopted or <br />that can be used as a basis for additional studies. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />Because of high-velocity conditions, the floodways were developed <br />for Fountain Creek, Ruxton Creek, Sutherland Creek, and Williams <br />Canyon by applying the allowable rise to the energy gradeline <br />instead of the water-surface elevation. Floodways were also identi- <br />fied by the criteria that allow a maximum ha;~ardous velocity of <br />3 feet per second at the edge of the floodway fringe. These hazar- <br />dous velocity criteria proved to be determinant in the floodway <br />delineation. For Williams Canyon and Ruxton Creek, the floodway <br />boundary is the same as the 100-year flood boundary. A floodway <br />fringe has been computed for some areas alonq Fountain and Sutherland <br />Creeks wihout reaching the allowed l-foot rise in energy gradeline <br />or water-surface elevation. The data presented in the Floodway <br />Data Table represents the computed water-surface elevations. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The floodways presented in this study were computed on the basis <br />of equal-conveyance reduction from each side of the flood plain. <br />The results of these computations were tabulated at selected cross <br />sections for each stream segment for which a floodway was computed <br />(Table 2). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />As shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway I~ap (Exhibit 2), the <br />floodway widths were determined at cross sections; between cross <br />sections, the boundaries were interpolated. In cases where the <br />boundaries of the floodway and the lOO-year flood are either close <br />together or collinear, only the floodway boundary has been shown. <br /> <br />The area between the floodway and the boundary of the 100-year <br />flood is termed the floodway fringe. The floodway fringe thus <br />encompasses the portion of the flood plain that could be completely <br />obstructed without increasing the water-surface elevation of the <br />100-year flood more than 1.0 foot at any point. Typical relation- <br />ships between the floodway and the floodway fringe and their signif- <br />icance to flood plain development are shown in Figure 4. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />l4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.