My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11727
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1100
>
FLOOD11727
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:23:54 AM
Creation date
5/19/2008 2:17:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
221
County
El Paso
Community
Manitou Springs
Basin
Arkansas
Title
FIS - Manitou Springs
Date
8/1/1983
Designation Date
1/5/1984
Prepared For
Manitou Springs
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Water-surface llevations of floods of the selected recurrence <br />intervals were computed through use of the U.S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers HEC-; step-backwater computer program (Reference 7). <br /> <br />Cross section tata and additional flood plain data for Fountain <br />Creek upstream of the road to the Cave of the Winds was obtained <br />from the Flood I Insurance study for the unincorporated areas of <br />El Paso County I (Reference 8). Cross sections used for the backwater <br />analyses of su~'herland Creek, Williams Canyon, and Ruxton Creek <br />were obtained rom detailed field surveys of each stream reach. <br />Cross sections ,used for the backwater analysis of Fountain Creek <br />downstream of ~he Road to the Cave of the Winds were furnished <br />by the U.S. Arty Corps of Engineers from the Flood plain Information <br />report for the larea published in 1974 (Reference 3). For Fountain <br />Creek and suth~rland Creek, supplemental cross sections were develop- <br />ed from topogr~phic maps at a scale of l:1,200, with contour inter- <br />vals of 4 and 40 feet (Reference 9). All bridges, culverts, and <br />other hydraulidally significant structures were field checked <br />to obtain elevJtion data and structural geometry. <br />I <br /> <br />Locations of sJlected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />I <br />are shown on t~e Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />for which a flqodway is computed (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locatidns are also shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway <br />Map (Exhibit 2)1. <br />I <br />Roughness fact<~rs (Manning l s "n") used in the hydraulic computations <br />for Sutherland Freek, Williams Canyon, and Ruxton Creek were chosen <br />by engineer ing Ijudgment and based on field observations of the <br />st::eams and ovelrbank areas. Roughness factors for the main channels <br />ranged from 0.0120 to 0.035, and overbank factors ranged from 0.040 <br />to 0.050 for flpods of the selected recurrence intervals. Roughness <br />factors for Fountain Creek downstream of the Road to the Cave <br />of the Winds we~e supplied by the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers <br />(Reference 3) ahd ranged from 0.020 to 0.040 for the main channel <br />and from 0.050 ~o 0.100 for the overbank areas for floods of the <br />selected recurrbnce intervals. <br />! <br /> <br />Starting water-~urface elevations for the streams studied in detail <br />were determinedl using the slope-area method or a critical depth <br />elevation. <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />Flood profiles ~ere drawn showing computed water-surface elevations <br />, <br />to an accuracy ~f 0.5 foot for floods of the selected recurrence <br />intervals (Exhibit 1). <br />I <br />\ <br />Generally, the ~istances on the flood profiles correspond to distances <br />measured along the centerline of the designated watercourses. <br />, <br />Along Williams ~anyon, however, the low-flow is carried through <br />an 1,100-foot, ~oncrete box culvert under Canon Avenue near to <br />the confluence ,ith Fountain Creek. In this area, the divergence <br />of the 10W-flow\drainage necessitated the use of distances measured <br /> <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />I <br />J <br />L~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.