My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11726
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1100
>
FLOOD11726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:23:54 AM
Creation date
5/19/2008 2:17:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
77
County
Boulder
Community
Longmont
Basin
South Platte
Title
FIS - Longmont
Date
1/1/1977
Designation Date
7/27/1977
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />The fldodway is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent <br />flood plain areas, that must be kept free of encroachment <br />in order that the 100-year flood be carried without sub- <br />stantial increases in flood height. As minimum stan- <br />dards, the Federal Insurance Administration limits such <br />increases in flood heights to 1.0 foot, provided that <br />hazardous velocities are not produced. <br /> <br />The flqodways computed for the streams in this study were <br />determined using both the criteria of flood plain en- <br />croachment and conveyance reduction as well as considera- <br />tion of hazardous velocities and depths within the flood <br />plain. The tributary streams to the St. Vrain Creek are <br />genera~ly steep and severely encroached upon by urban <br />development. Further encroachment or conveyance ability <br />reduction would result in increased velocities above <br />already hazardous velocity conditions. Hazardous veloci- <br />ties are considered to be average overbank velocities <br />in excess of 2 to 3 feet per second. As shown on the <br />Floodway Map (Exhibit 3) the floodway limits for each <br />of the streams except Dry Creek, were plotted at the <br />cross section locations; between the cross sections, <br />the floodway boundaries have been drawn to represent <br />streamlined limits characteristic of floodway limits. <br />The flOodway for Dry Creek was contained within the chan- <br />nel, and therefore was not shown on the map and table. <br /> <br />Many factors affect the determination of the encroach- <br />ment limits on each stream, including sand and gravel <br />mining operations, overtopped bridges, present develop- <br />ment w~thin the flood plain, and divided flow conditions. <br />To determine the final floodway boundary at each cross <br />section, characteristic velocities were considered, along <br />with encroachment limits which cause no more than the <br />maximu~ 1 foot rise in the flood height. Where appropri- <br />ate, an equal degree of encroachment was permitted on <br />each side of the main channel. The degree of conveyance <br />reduction on each side of the channel was determined by <br />hydraulic limitations. <br /> <br />The results of these floodway computations are tabulated <br />at selected cross sections for St. Vrain Creek, Spring <br />Gulch, and Left Hand Creek (Table 1). <br /> <br />The ar~a between the floodway and the boundary of the <br />100-year flood is termed the floodway fringe. The flood- <br />way fringe thus encompasses the portion of the flood <br />plain that could be completely obstructed without <br />increa~ing the water-surface elevation of the 100-year <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.