PROJC01779 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

available for taxpayers review at OMID's January 1995 annual meeting. Public notice was given that OMID's feasibility study was completed September 20, 1996, or about two years after design completion, and fifteen months after the Governors approval. Comment: It is clear that the eWeB staff made an ex parte decision to waive the requirement that a feasibility study be prepared before seeking ap- provals. Also, eWeB's staff knew NReS had prepared the design plan before the loan request. This means the MML feasibilitv stud v is intentional deception to hold OMID landowners responsible for repavina a loan issued bv public emplov- ees for the benefit of owners of a private aolt course. Anv licensed professional enaineer aareeina to prepare an after-the-fact document to obtain public funds must be viewed as directlv aidina and abettina intentional cover-up of the issuance of fraudulent aovernment contracts. This conclusion is easily reached when one discovers a letter written by this profes- sional advising how to alter accounts to alleviate a taxpaying landowners com- plaints. What Is It? (In no particular order) · If aMID is a local government, how can it form MMLE by board resolution? · How can MMLE be formed without approval of the County Commissioners, the court, and a vote by OMID landowners? . · How can aMID form an enterprise if it doesn't issue stock? · If OMID is issuing stock, as some documents show, why can't I sell or trans- fer my shares for use at other locations? · If aMID is not a government, why does it certify to the Department of Local Affairs that it's revenue is obtained from taxes collected by Mesa County? · What rule of law gives MMLE authority to use OMID's Federal tax 10 number, and State sales tax exemption number? rn · What rule of law gives MtLE authority to charge aMID fees? I · aMID has contracts with the United States, Public Service Company, and the Grand Valley Water Users Association for the carriage of water to MML us- ers. If it can be proven that MMLE is a legal enterprise, do these contracts have to be amended to include MMLE? 17