Laserfiche WebLink
<br />103 (1), 1 C.R.S. (1997). In contrast to these requirements, a <br /> <br />qualified voter in an irrigation district is not required to be a <br /> <br />natural person. These elections include nonresident <br /> <br />landowners,ll all entities owning land within the district,12 and <br /> <br />proxy voters.I3 Thus, nonresident, unregistered voters, who own <br /> <br />land irrigated by the irrigation district, are eligible to vote <br /> <br />in irrigation district elections.14 Also, irrigation district <br /> <br />elections depart from the traditional "one person, one vote" <br /> <br />requirement for governmental elections.15 A landowner in an <br /> <br />irrigation district may cast a number of votes equal to the <br /> <br />11 See ~ 37-42-106(2), 10 C.R.S. (1997) (nonresidents of <br />precinct may vote). <br /> <br />12 See ~ 37-42-114 (1), 10 C.R.S. (1997) (defining <br />"landowners" as "any persons, natural or artificial, resident or <br />nonresident" ) . <br /> <br />13 See ~ 37-42-108 (1), 10 C.R.S. (1997) (voting for <br />irrigation district board of directors can be by proxy) . <br /> <br />14 In People v. Milan, 89 Colo; 557, 563, 5 P.2d 249, 253 <br />(1931), we recognized that "the legislature proposed and intended <br />to place the ultimate power and responsibility of determining all <br />questions of policy affecting the irrigation districts upon the <br />owners of the agricultural and horticultural lands therein." <br /> <br />15 The "one person, one vote" principle originated in the <br />United States Supreme Court's decisions of Baker v. Carr, 369 <br />U.S. 186 (1962), and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964). <br /> <br />11 <br />