Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MAPPING METHODS <br /> <br />Two methods were employed. Detailed maps having 35 <br />cover type categories were produced by conventional <br />air photointerpretation. However, the lack of <br />adequate contemporary aircraft coverage for the <br />entire target area justified the use of satellite <br />data. Computer-aided analysis techniques using <br />LANDSAT-l data produced a logogramatic map of <br />generalized vegetation for 9,644 km2 (2.5 million <br />acres) (Hoffer, Fleming, and Krebs 1974). <br /> <br />Detailed Vegetation Maps <br /> <br />Detailed vegetation maps of the San Juan Mountains <br />were originally prepared at a scale of 1:24,000. <br />These maps are filed at the Institute for Arctic and <br />Alpine Research (INSTAAR) for use by interested <br />persons. The coding system for the cover type <br />categories is given in Table 1. The area of detailed <br />mapping covers 14 USGS 7~' quadrangle maps along a <br />belt near the southern border of the San Juan Mountains <br />(Figure 2). Using these maps, spatial relationships <br />of plant communities and topographic features become <br />apparent. The cover type categories chosen (Table 1) <br />represen4 recurring plant communities and provide <br />manageable information without confusing detail. <br /> <br />N37030' <br /> <br />orJ o~ ~ (}~ A.,<v <br />~~ <v~$ .:y'<i ~ -t~~ <br />~'<i I ",p 2~r.,Jf3$'q,4;4 <br /> <br />o <v" ~ ~ <br />+CIi,.., ,'t'+ v+ ~ <br />g,."""A., ~~;y .;:,~ q,,,".t Q~~+ <br />Q;:j<v,," a 9" 10 II ....-12 <br /> <br />~ <br />r.,""A.,+ <br />q,~ <br />5 <br /> <br />$' ~"" <br />#',. 0 ~ <br />~G' q,~r.,,," <br />o'f'~6 q, 7 <br /> <br />I <br />W107052'30" <br /> <br />~.. "" <br />CJ~ A.,+ f:>o"~f:> <br />~ 13 q,,,".:-q,;14 <br />I <br />WI07000' <br /> <br />N37015' <br /> <br />Figure 2. <br /> <br />Area covered.by detailed vegetation maps <br />at a scale of 1:24,000. <br /> <br />U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Geological Survey air <br />photography were used for the preliminary maps. Mark <br />Hurd's quadrangle-centered 1971 series of air photo- <br />graphic map documents were acquired from the Colorado <br />Office of State Planning for portions of the study <br />area. To obtain aircraft coverage for the entire <br />area, however, would have been prohibitively expensive. <br />Acquisition of NASA mission coverage (National Aero- <br />nautics and Space Administration Aixcraft Mission <br />Center) of infrared and color positive films in support <br />of the LANDSAT-l and Sky lab investigations (contract <br />numbers NAS5-21880 and NAS9-13380, respectively) solved <br />this problem. The NASA flights used in the vegetation <br />mapping were Mission 213 (September 1972), Mission 238 <br />and Mission 239 (June 1973), and Mission 248 (August <br />1973). <br /> <br />Field-verified cover type standards were noted on pre- <br />liminary maps and used in photointerpretation to in- <br />crease accuracy in the laboratory. The Hurd photog- <br />raphy facilitated both photointerpretation and spat~al <br />correction when transferring the cover type boundar1es <br />to the base maps. National Aeronautics and Space <br />Administration (NASA) color infrared imagery (Mission <br />248, Roll 24, and Mission 238, Roll 48) aided in <br />identification of mapping units. The photointer- <br />pretive results from the color infrared aircraft <br />coverage were delineated directly on the Hurd photo- <br />graphs. Correct placement of boundaries was insured <br />by keying on geographic points and topographic features <br />visible on the two types of aircraft coverage (Figure 3). <br /> <br />For portions of several quadrangles, complete Hurd <br />coverage was not available; in these cases, photo- <br />interpretation was based strictly on the NASA <br />coverage. <br />NASA Color Infrared Aerial Photography <br />(of differing scales) ~ <br /> <br /> <br />Field Check Standards 4 ~ Photo Interpretation <br /> <br />/j <br /> <br /> <br />Hurd Photo absent Hurd Photo <br /> <br /> <br />/ "<"'I "".000) <br /> <br /> <br />Interpolation of Scale Directly Spatial Correction onto <br /> <br />"::'~":'i::;::;'\ /.,:~;:;::;)~' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Finished Produc ts <br />1) Mylar Overlay <br />2) USGS Topographic Base Map <br /> <br />Figure 3. Vegetation mapping methods. <br /> <br />The color and hue of the various cover types are <br />distinctive on the color infrared film (Table 2). <br />However, accurate photointerpretation in areas of <br />shadow requires an awareness of both topographic <br />features and elevation (Krebs and Groeneveld 1974). <br /> <br />The final colored vegetation map at 1:120,000 (in <br />map pocket) was compiled from the detailed vege- <br />tation maps and portrays a generalized trend of <br />vegetation changes. The following combined cover <br />type ca~egories were used; coniferous, deciduous, <br />deciduous-coniferous, meadow-grassland-agricultural, <br />tundra, creek community, water, bare rock-bare soil, <br />and urban. The code system (Table 1) used on the <br />detailed maps was designed for combination of <br />categories. For example, all codes in the 220s <br />represent coniferous forest, 230s represent <br />deciduous-coniferous forests, and 160s represent <br />agricultural lands. This coding system permitted <br />translation into the classification terminology of <br />the generalized map at a smaller scale, and it per- <br />mitted formation of new complexes which represent <br />vegetation entities of composite character. Some <br />funds for production of the maps were provided by <br />NASA contract NAS5-21880, NASA contract NAS9-13380, <br />NASA Grant NGL-06-003-200. <br /> <br />Translation from detailed to generalized vegetation <br />must correspond to an accurate portrayal as closely <br />as the scale permits. If a cover type occupies only <br />a very small area, it is usually suppressed alto- <br />gether. But there are cases when a small area is <br />enlarged enough to be visible on the smaller scale <br />map. This applies to instances where portrayal of <br />special cover types contributes to a better under- <br />standing of the map as a whole. For example, because <br />of the importance of creek communities and bare rock- <br />bare soil areas in an ecological overview, these <br />units are exaggerated for their inclusion on the <br />smaller scale map. Often the deciduous-coniferous <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />82 <br />