<br />MAPPING METHODS
<br />
<br />Two methods were employed. Detailed maps having 35
<br />cover type categories were produced by conventional
<br />air photointerpretation. However, the lack of
<br />adequate contemporary aircraft coverage for the
<br />entire target area justified the use of satellite
<br />data. Computer-aided analysis techniques using
<br />LANDSAT-l data produced a logogramatic map of
<br />generalized vegetation for 9,644 km2 (2.5 million
<br />acres) (Hoffer, Fleming, and Krebs 1974).
<br />
<br />Detailed Vegetation Maps
<br />
<br />Detailed vegetation maps of the San Juan Mountains
<br />were originally prepared at a scale of 1:24,000.
<br />These maps are filed at the Institute for Arctic and
<br />Alpine Research (INSTAAR) for use by interested
<br />persons. The coding system for the cover type
<br />categories is given in Table 1. The area of detailed
<br />mapping covers 14 USGS 7~' quadrangle maps along a
<br />belt near the southern border of the San Juan Mountains
<br />(Figure 2). Using these maps, spatial relationships
<br />of plant communities and topographic features become
<br />apparent. The cover type categories chosen (Table 1)
<br />represen4 recurring plant communities and provide
<br />manageable information without confusing detail.
<br />
<br />N37030'
<br />
<br />orJ o~ ~ (}~ A.,<v
<br />~~ <v~$ .:y'<i ~ -t~~
<br />~'<i I ",p 2~r.,Jf3$'q,4;4
<br />
<br />o <v" ~ ~
<br />+CIi,.., ,'t'+ v+ ~
<br />g,."""A., ~~;y .;:,~ q,,,".t Q~~+
<br />Q;:j<v,," a 9" 10 II ....-12
<br />
<br />~
<br />r.,""A.,+
<br />q,~
<br />5
<br />
<br />$' ~""
<br />#',. 0 ~
<br />~G' q,~r.,,,"
<br />o'f'~6 q, 7
<br />
<br />I
<br />W107052'30"
<br />
<br />~.. ""
<br />CJ~ A.,+ f:>o"~f:>
<br />~ 13 q,,,".:-q,;14
<br />I
<br />WI07000'
<br />
<br />N37015'
<br />
<br />Figure 2.
<br />
<br />Area covered.by detailed vegetation maps
<br />at a scale of 1:24,000.
<br />
<br />U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Geological Survey air
<br />photography were used for the preliminary maps. Mark
<br />Hurd's quadrangle-centered 1971 series of air photo-
<br />graphic map documents were acquired from the Colorado
<br />Office of State Planning for portions of the study
<br />area. To obtain aircraft coverage for the entire
<br />area, however, would have been prohibitively expensive.
<br />Acquisition of NASA mission coverage (National Aero-
<br />nautics and Space Administration Aixcraft Mission
<br />Center) of infrared and color positive films in support
<br />of the LANDSAT-l and Sky lab investigations (contract
<br />numbers NAS5-21880 and NAS9-13380, respectively) solved
<br />this problem. The NASA flights used in the vegetation
<br />mapping were Mission 213 (September 1972), Mission 238
<br />and Mission 239 (June 1973), and Mission 248 (August
<br />1973).
<br />
<br />Field-verified cover type standards were noted on pre-
<br />liminary maps and used in photointerpretation to in-
<br />crease accuracy in the laboratory. The Hurd photog-
<br />raphy facilitated both photointerpretation and spat~al
<br />correction when transferring the cover type boundar1es
<br />to the base maps. National Aeronautics and Space
<br />Administration (NASA) color infrared imagery (Mission
<br />248, Roll 24, and Mission 238, Roll 48) aided in
<br />identification of mapping units. The photointer-
<br />pretive results from the color infrared aircraft
<br />coverage were delineated directly on the Hurd photo-
<br />graphs. Correct placement of boundaries was insured
<br />by keying on geographic points and topographic features
<br />visible on the two types of aircraft coverage (Figure 3).
<br />
<br />For portions of several quadrangles, complete Hurd
<br />coverage was not available; in these cases, photo-
<br />interpretation was based strictly on the NASA
<br />coverage.
<br />NASA Color Infrared Aerial Photography
<br />(of differing scales) ~
<br />
<br />
<br />Field Check Standards 4 ~ Photo Interpretation
<br />
<br />/j
<br />
<br />
<br />Hurd Photo absent Hurd Photo
<br />
<br />
<br />/ "<"'I "".000)
<br />
<br />
<br />Interpolation of Scale Directly Spatial Correction onto
<br />
<br />"::'~":'i::;::;'\ /.,:~;:;::;)~'
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Finished Produc ts
<br />1) Mylar Overlay
<br />2) USGS Topographic Base Map
<br />
<br />Figure 3. Vegetation mapping methods.
<br />
<br />The color and hue of the various cover types are
<br />distinctive on the color infrared film (Table 2).
<br />However, accurate photointerpretation in areas of
<br />shadow requires an awareness of both topographic
<br />features and elevation (Krebs and Groeneveld 1974).
<br />
<br />The final colored vegetation map at 1:120,000 (in
<br />map pocket) was compiled from the detailed vege-
<br />tation maps and portrays a generalized trend of
<br />vegetation changes. The following combined cover
<br />type ca~egories were used; coniferous, deciduous,
<br />deciduous-coniferous, meadow-grassland-agricultural,
<br />tundra, creek community, water, bare rock-bare soil,
<br />and urban. The code system (Table 1) used on the
<br />detailed maps was designed for combination of
<br />categories. For example, all codes in the 220s
<br />represent coniferous forest, 230s represent
<br />deciduous-coniferous forests, and 160s represent
<br />agricultural lands. This coding system permitted
<br />translation into the classification terminology of
<br />the generalized map at a smaller scale, and it per-
<br />mitted formation of new complexes which represent
<br />vegetation entities of composite character. Some
<br />funds for production of the maps were provided by
<br />NASA contract NAS5-21880, NASA contract NAS9-13380,
<br />NASA Grant NGL-06-003-200.
<br />
<br />Translation from detailed to generalized vegetation
<br />must correspond to an accurate portrayal as closely
<br />as the scale permits. If a cover type occupies only
<br />a very small area, it is usually suppressed alto-
<br />gether. But there are cases when a small area is
<br />enlarged enough to be visible on the smaller scale
<br />map. This applies to instances where portrayal of
<br />special cover types contributes to a better under-
<br />standing of the map as a whole. For example, because
<br />of the importance of creek communities and bare rock-
<br />bare soil areas in an ecological overview, these
<br />units are exaggerated for their inclusion on the
<br />smaller scale map. Often the deciduous-coniferous
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />82
<br />
|