My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00593
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:42:09 PM
Creation date
4/30/2008 2:44:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Contract/Permit #
14-06-D-7052
Title
Ecological Impacts of Snowpack Augmentation in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado
Date
3/1/1976
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
498
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />monthly data into meaningful categories for the <br />growth response of trees in the final detailed <br />analyses. Parallel trends indicate a direct re- <br />lationship of growth layer thickness with the <br />climatic factor. Opposite trends indicate an <br />inverse relationship of growth layer thickness with <br />the climatic factor. <br /> <br />A sample of the results from the trend method is <br />given for monthly precipitation using six recording <br />stations and one coring station for 15 months <br />(Table 2). Only the trend coefficient is included <br />but the preliminary evaluation also considered the <br />index values and ratios. From the data sets the <br />Durango and Pagosa Springs weather records w~re <br />selected for use in subsequent analysis. Pagosa <br />Springs correlations are high and relatively <br />consistent. <br /> <br />The complete trend analysis for monthly precipi- <br />tation from the Pagosa Springs weather station with <br />tree ring data from station SJS-1 is given in <br />Table 3. For the previous December precipitation, <br />the variation is mainly parallel and highly corre- <br />lated. For August precipitation, the amplitude of <br />opposite trends is greater than that of parallel <br />trends. <br /> <br />The results of this preliminary evaluation provided <br />a means for the selection of potentially important <br />monthly data of precipitation and temperature for <br />more detailed analysis. Pagosa Springs and Durango <br />weather data sets were chosen and specific groupings <br />of monthly data were selected. <br /> <br />-Descriptive Statistics <br /> <br />Table 4 presents the means and standard deviations of <br />tree ring widths for each study site and for each of <br />the three time spans corresponding to the period <br />of record for the climatic stations. In addition <br />the correlation coefficients between the tree rin~ <br />chronologies for the three study sites are presented <br />for each time span. <br /> <br />For the period 1896-1970, the time period used in <br />the bulk of the analysis, growth layer widths at <br />SJS-1 and SJS-2 have a correlation coefficient of <br />0.18. This lack of regional correlation indicates <br />that the climatic environment may not be uniformly <br />represented by the tree ring sequence exhibited by <br />the three study plots. This emphasizes the need <br />in size selection for near-optimum or relatively <br />dry sites for studies of this nature. Station SJS-3 <br />has a relatively high and uniform soil moisture <br />throughout the year and is not characteristic of <br />the area as a whole. <br /> <br />-Detailed Analysis <br /> <br />Two parametric statistical approaches were used in <br />the final phase of the data analysis: stepwise <br />multiple regressio~and bivariate techniques in- <br />cluding the calculation of serial regression co- <br />efficients. Individual monthly temperature and <br />precipitation values, as well as seasonal aggre- <br />gates of these figures, served as independent vari- <br />ables in the regression analysis. <br /> <br />Table 2. Summary (trend coefficient) of preliminary analyses using the trend method for precipitation <br /> with tree growth of station SJS-l. <br />Preceding Growing Season <br /> July Aug. Sept. <br />Ouray 0 + 0 <br />-Lake City 0 + <br />Telluride 0 0 0 <br />Durango 0 <br />Pagosa Springs +(.51) + <br />Silverton 0 <br />Winter Prior to Growing Season <br /> Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March <br />Ouray 0 +(.53) +(.49 ) +(.89) <br />Lake City +(.61) + +(.46) +.49) +(.65) <br />Telluride 0 + +(.57) + + + <br />Durango 0 + +(.53) +.59) 0 + <br />Pagosa Springs 0 + +(.91) + ( . 68) + +(.62) <br />Si1verton + +(.48) +(.61) + 0 <br />During Growing Season <br /> April May June July Aug. Sept. <br />Ouray + 0 0 0 - (.64) + <br />Lake City 0 +(.54 ) 0 0 0 0 <br />Telluride 0 0 0 0 + 0 <br />Durango + + +(.66) + 0 0 <br />Pagosa Springs 0 +(.58) 0 -(.73) + <br />Si1verton 0 + + 0 + + <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />0=</.25/ <br /> <br />+ = >/.25/ < /.50/ <br /> <br />Value when> / . 50/ <br /> <br />Length of record used (years): Ouray 23 (1943-1966); Lake City 61 (1905-1966); Telluride 55 (1911-1966); <br />Durango 72 (1894-1966); Pagosa Springs 27 (1939-1966); Si1verton 60 (1906-1966). <br /> <br />73 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.