Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Clearly, to obtain more information for this period <br />will require a study over a larger area encompassing <br />more stations; with our present state of knowledge <br />such conclusions as have been drawn should be con- <br />sidered tentative. However, an examination of the <br />temperature record, which appears more complete, may <br />shed more light on the problem, in view of the <br />generally inverse relationship noted between 20th <br />century precipitation and temperature records <br />(see section on "Analysis of temperature data" in <br />this report). <br /> <br />Precipitation size-frequency analysis <br /> <br />As mentioned previously, an interesting aspect of <br />climatic variation in the area is the question of <br />precipitation size-frequencies changing over time. <br />An analysis of the trends in size-frequency dis- <br />tributions has been performed using daily precipi- <br />tation data for Durango (1896-1970) and Silverton <br />(1906-1970). Figure 15 shows the change in frequency <br /> <br />120 <br />110 <br />100 <br />90 <br />80 <br />;;-70 <br />;60 <br />&50 <br />.. <br />'::40 <br />30 <br />20 <br />18961900 10 <br /> <br /> <br />-x <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />60 1970 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />Figure 15. Frequency of precipitation-size class <br />0.05-1.25 cm in Durango. Annual. <br /> <br />of precipitation events resulting in daily totals <br />of less than 12.5 mm (.5 inches) at Durango. Pre- <br />cipitation events of less than 12.5 mm (.5 inches) <br />were markedly below normal around the turn of the <br />century, corresponding to the major dry period at <br />this time, followed by a period of above average <br />frequency over the subsequent 10 years. Since the <br />early 1920's, however, no progressive changes and <br />no major periods of above-or below-average frequency <br />of occurrence have appeared. <br /> <br />For precipitation size classes greater than 12.5 mm <br />(.5 inches), frequencies were on the whole above <br />average prior to the late 1920's or early 1930's <br />(particularly in winter months) and below average <br />for the subsequent 20 years (Figures 16 and 17). <br />It would appear that the major precipitation minima <br />and maxima in the record are not the result of a <br />change in the frequency of anyone precipitation size <br />class, but rather. the integrated result of changes <br />in the frequency of precipitation events of all <br />sizes. However, it is clear that small changes in <br />the frequency of large precipitation events can <br />greatly influence the overall annual totals of <br />precipitation. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS OF TEMPERATURE DATA, SAN 'JUAN AREA <br /> <br />Running Mean Analysis <br /> <br />Long-term temperature records for southern Colorado <br />are less common than long-term precipitation <br />records. However, the temperature record for the <br />Fort Massachusetts/Fort Garland data appears to have <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br /> <br />7 <br />6 <br />>>5 <br />o <br />c: 4 <br />CII <br />~ 3 <br />tT <br />CII 2 <br />U:1 <br /> <br />o <br />1890 1900 10 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />60 1970 <br /> <br />Figure 16. <br /> 19 <br /> 18 <br /> 17 <br /> 16 <br /> 15 <br /> 14 <br /> 13 <br />>>12 <br />gll <br />CII <br />&10 <br />~9 <br />I.L. <br /> 8 <br /> 7 <br /> 6 <br /> 5 <br /> 4 <br /> 3 <br /> 2 <br /> 1900 10 <br />Figure 17. <br /> <br />Frequency of precipitation-size <br />classes > 2.5 cm in Durango. Annual. <br /> <br /> <br />- --X <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />1970 <br /> <br />Frequency of precipitation-size <br />classes 1-2.5 cm in Silverton. Annual. <br /> <br />been more carefully kept than the precipitation <br />record and thus a valuable analysis of the data for <br />the latter half of the 19th century is possible. <br />For the period 1889-1900, virtually no records are <br />available for the area. For this reason, 19th <br />century stations operative in adjacent states were <br />used to supplement the data available in Colorado <br />(e.g. Fort Union, New Mexico, Figure 18). <br /> <br />Mean annual temperatures .rose markedly during the <br />late 1850's and 1860's to a high around 1867. <br />Temperatures then fell slowly to 1890, and possibly <br />over the subsequent 10 years (here the record is <br />absent), with a continuing decline to approximately <br />1930. Again, seasonal values shed more light on <br />the fluctuations. <br /> <br />An examination of the seasonal temperature record <br />by means of 9 year weighted running means <br />shows that individual peaks and troughs in the <br />records do not always correspond. Indeed in some <br />cases one station may show a marked peak in the <br />record while another may show a major trough <br />(Figure 19). Such variations are probably partly <br />related to the topographic characteristics of each <br />