Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />somewhat before the ice nuclei plume arrived. This suggests the plume was sheared in the vertical <br />with the portion near the surface being offset to the north or south of TAR for most of the <br />experiment. The characteristics of the flow near the surface are somewhat unknown, and forcing <br />by local terrain features might also act to carry the plume away from the TAR site. One such feature <br />is the north-south oriented canyon just up\vind ofT AR {visible in Fig. 1 and matching the north- <br />south section of Highway 264 in Fig. 43J which slopes to the south into Electric Lake. In a stable <br />enyironment aerosols might be trapped in this canyon, and forced to move with the canyon <br />orientation, possibly affected by drainage flow. The Clark Model (Heimbach and Hall, 1994) with <br />high terrain resolution \\:ould be quite useful in analyzing this problem. <br /> <br />4. Summary of 26 Januar}' Case <br />This case served mainly as a demonstration of the usefulness of combining data sets from <br />mobile surface instrumentation. The storm had some seeding potential, \..-ith small amounts of SL W <br />observed during the seeding period. The temperature structure was such that AgI aerosols should <br />have been active as ice nuclei in the cloud region where seeding material was detected. Although <br />one atmospheric sounding showed a slight amount of convective instability, the seeding aerosol <br />plumes were not lifted more than about 250 m above the top of the Wasatch Plateau. The plume <br />from one of two generators was well documented as it reached the top of the Plateau by surface <br />instruments, but detection at aircraft altitude was rare. <br />Seeding effects are yet to be documented in this experiment. The careful documentation of <br />seeding plume locations at the surface allowed mobile radiometer data to be stratified according to <br />being in-plume or out-of-plume. The SL W depths measured in-plume on individual interceptions <br />at times appeared to be depleted, c~mpared to depths on either side of the plume, but overall the in- <br />plume SL \V average depth was not significantly different from out-of-plume depths. The radar data <br />showed the evolution of the natural cloud precipitation quite well, but seeding effects, if they <br />occurred, \Vere masked by the rather strong returns from the natural precipitation. Only the very end <br />of the seeding experiment was characterized by ,weaker radar echo and higher SL W amounts, and <br />may have some potential for revealing seeding effects under more detailed analysis. The best chance <br />for detecting seeding effects rests in the 2D probe data from the Starship and the target site, and this <br /> <br />61 <br />