Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The approach of a fa~t moving short wave that was rotating around the strong offshore trough <br />is quite evident in Fig. 23 when: the wind backed from ahout 260010 2000 between 1700 and 2000. <br />Dry air was advcctcd over Utah from the south. in sharp contrast 10 the typical prctrough <br /> <br />"'''' <br />0,' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~s - <br /> <br /> <br />f. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />;RRS <br /> <br />- - <br /> <br />Figure 2-1. GOES mfrared mwgefrom /ROO CiA-fr(l/()() A/S1) 01/ IV February /(1)-1. <br /> <br />environment This advection of dry air is evident in the de".' pomt depression contours of Fig. 25, <br />the cloud and 700 mb patterns at 1700 on 19 February. As Ihis "dry slot" moved into central Utah <br />the cloud field dissipated and SL W disappeared over RRS by 1730. The drying is also seen in the <br />decreasing vapor after 1700 on Fig. 23. The organized cloud band associated v"ith the short wave <br />to the west oflJtah is clearly evident In Fig. 25, where the height field indicates the v..ave axis was <br />in central California. <br />This short wave moved across the northwest corner of Utah and most of the moisture <br />associated with It stayed to the northwest of the research area. The north\".cst-southeast orientation <br /> <br />34 <br />