Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Only data from storms on 26 January and 19 February have been analyzed in detail. For the <br />special analysis needed on these (and other) days, 1\\'0 programs were \\Titten~ one to read and select <br />data oyer specific ground points, and another to integrate these data into files of parameters in time <br />and height format that can be manipulated with objective analysis schemes for plotting and <br />displaying o\'er a uniform grid. These programs are suited to the development of relationships <br />bem'een radar retlectivity factor and precipitation rate. and for analyzing regions inside and outside <br />seeding plumes for differences in radar reflectivity factor. <br />Instruments at the target site (TAR in Fig. 1) were similar to those at RRS, but TAR had no <br />radiometer or radar. Included in the data collection at TAR were snow samples for trace chemical <br />analysis of silver. These samples and snow particle photographs were collected time sequentially <br />during seeding experiments. Huggins (1994) documents the snow sample history. As \\ith data from <br />RRS_ the DRI acquired 6-min averages of the TAR data after it was processed at the USBR in <br />Denver. <br />The other ground-based data used in this report are precipitation data from the 12" orifice <br />recording gages, whose locations are sho\\TI in Fig.!, and data from the Doppler acoustic sounder <br />located at DAS in Fig. 1. The USBR also reduced and processed these data and sent the final <br />products to DR!. Precipitation data consisted of amounts at 30 min intervals. Doppler data were <br />averaged over 10 min periods. The maximum vertical range of the data varied depending on the <br />structure of the atmosphere over the sounder. The maximum height of useable data was generally <br />less than 1 km above the surface. <br />Finally, data from a ~OAA-operated King Air research aircraft were also used in some of <br />the subsequent storm analyses. The King Air data system is thoroughly described by Heimbach <br />(1994). Studies in this report take advantage of processed data, primarily I-see data from a fast <br />response sulfur hexaflouride (SF J detector, I-sec data from an NCAR ice nucleus counter, and 3-sec <br />averages of temperature, height, FSSP concentration, 2DC concentration, and position. <br /> <br />III. 1994 STOR\I PERIOD DESCRIPTIOSS <br /> <br />The 1994 ~OA~.t\-Utah field program took place bet\veen 15 January and 15 March. There <br /> <br />9 <br />