Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />and the C.S. Bureau of Reclamation (CSBR) radiometer that collected data continuously in zenith <br />mode at the radar-radiometer site tRRS in Fig. 1). Tipping curve calibration factors (Decker and <br />SchroedeL 1991) were computed periodically throughout the field program for each radiometer. <br />These "tip car factors compensated for internal electronic variations, and allowed for quantitative <br />comparisons of the derived liquid and vapor depths. The USBR radiometer produced 2-min averages <br />of liquid and vapor depth throughout the field project, while the DRI mobile radiometer generally <br />recorded 1-4 s averages in mobile mode, or 5-min averages in stationary mode at HQ. <br />Operation of the mobile radiometer is described in detail by Huggins (1994, 1995). During <br />the 1994 field program the instrument \"'as driven over the roads shown in Fig. 1 to monitor SL W <br />upwind of. oyer, and dO\\TIwind of the Wasatch Plateau. Some experiments were designed for <br />comparison \\ith the stationary radiometer to document the natural change in SL W depth across the <br />plateau. Other experiments focussed on observing the SL \V inside and outside seeding plumes. to <br />determine whether SL \V was depleted by the effects of seeding. As a check on the calibration of the <br />mobile radiometer, integrated vapor depths were compared to sounding precipitable water values <br />during ten sounding launches in January, February and March 1994. On two occasions the <br />radiometer was parked at the ylt. Pleasant i\irport. During five of the other cases the radiometer was <br />at HQ, and during the other three cases the radiometer was on top of the Plateau. For the latter cases <br />the sounding precipitable water was computed upward from the height of the radiometer. The <br />comparative data are shov.n in Fig. 2 and reveal a very good correspondence betw'een sounding and <br />radiometer vapor values, with the linear regression line passing nearly through the origin and an <br />overall correlation of 0.962. <br />In addition to the mobile radiometer, a second mobile instrumented van was stationed at HQ <br />and used document seeding aerosol plume positions using an SF 6 detector and an NCAR ice nucleus <br />counter. The van was also equipped with a Panicle Measuring System 2DC laser imaging probe, <br />standard meteorological instruments, and a GPS for determining position. North American Weather <br />Consultants (\iAWC) handled operation of the van. This report makes use of l-s data from the SF 6 <br />and KC-<\R counters. <br />Silver iodide seeding generators were positioned pan way up the western (windward) slope <br />of the plateau at HA.S and AHS in Fig. 1. The sites were at 2538 m and 2343 m, respectively, and <br /> <br />5 <br />