My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00589
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00589
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:41:34 PM
Creation date
4/28/2008 3:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Contract/Permit #
7-07-83-V0008
Project Name
Project Skywater
Title
Project Skywater - Skywater Conference X - The Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project Design
Prepared By
North American Weather Consultants, Inc.
Date
6/1/1979
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />A oajor focus of the ne....; CEQ regulations is the section of the as called <br />"alternath-es to the proposal". Here again, one ruIlS into an interesting <br />dichoto;J.Y bet.....-een research and development proposals. wp.at are the true <br />alternatives to research. Of course, the first is plain ai"ld si-rnple: ~ <br />research. But after that, Khat? The sa.llle list of alternatives we have <br />com.e to e:X1>ect to see in a "traditional" ilTIpOlmdTJent proj eet? I '-.'Culd <br />appreciate hearing your thoughts and suggestions on this. <br /> <br />Finally, the EIS IIRlst e:Xplain the coordination process that has occurred <br />during the project design phase. The SCPP has benefited from good coordi- <br />nation responses fron State and Federal agencies, rrOOl the local agenCl.es <br />and many interesting citizens. It has been a rewarding effort. The <br />feedback and assistance v:e receive strengthen the progran design effort. <br /> <br />If there are any questions, I can respond to them now or at any tine <br />during the course of the :meeting. Thank you. <br /> <br />DR. AR'iOLD (CURT: At a meeting I attended last \.;eek, the question came <br />up about the policy of the Federal Governoent for any artificial precipi- <br />tation over \dlderness areas. There is a ""i.lderness area in this target <br />ani I \...'Onder \'iTIat is the status? I ara asking for htfonuation that I <br />couldn't get. <br /> <br />~lR. H-\RRIS: i\e have some experts in the audience on wilderness areas <br />who nay help us. I \\uuld defer to any of the people from the Forest <br />Service who "uuld like to discJSs Kilderness policy. <br /> <br />I'-1R. PAUL LEGE"R.: I didn't come prepared to discUss the \\"ilderness policy, <br />but one of its main features is that LT1. any activity that :i1!lpacts the <br />\dlderness area, the proponent must be prepared to sho\o,; that his activity <br />\....ill not create any long-term, lasting effects upon that environment. <br /> <br />Now, as far as Keather ~odification activities go, it's very difficult <br />to shm.... the :impacts of the long-tenn management before the activity occurs. <br /> <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.