Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> CONTENTS <br /> Page <br /> Acknowledgement . . ii <br />1. Introduction. . . 1 <br />II. Nature and Purpose of Study 1 <br />III. Materials . 1 <br />IV. Procedures . 6 <br />V. Results . 8 <br />IV. Summary and Conclusions .15 <br /> <br />APPENDIXES <br /> <br />A. Plotted Data for Individual Tests. . . . . . . . . . . .17 <br /> <br />B. Comparison of Chart Recorded Precipitation Amounts versus <br />Inputs Estimated from Control Flow Data. . . . . . . . .33 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />Tabl e <br /> <br />1. Calibration of the Belfort Raingage (inches of water) 7 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Universal Recording Raingage Test Schedule. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />3. Weighed Amounts of Precipitation Caught in the Gages <br />Compared to Indicated Amounts on the Chart. . . . . . . .14 <br /> <br />FIGURES <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Figure l-Test Location. . . . . . . <br /> <br />2 <br />4 <br /> <br />2. Figure 2-Belfort Raingage Test Configuration. <br /> <br />3. Figure 3-Distribution of Departures Between Control Flow <br />Estimates and Chart Amount Estimates. . .13 <br /> <br />4. Figure 4-Precipitation Gage Test 319-1B <br />5. Figure 5-Precipitation Gage Test 319-1C <br /> <br />.18 <br />.19 <br /> <br />6. Figure 6-Precipitation Gage Test 320-1A <br /> <br />.20 <br /> <br />v <br />