My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00580
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00580
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:41:08 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project
Title
Supercooled Liquid Water and Ice Crystal Distributions Within Sierra Nevada Winter Storms
Date
11/11/1983
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />NOVEMBER 1983 <br /> <br />HEGGLI ET AL. <br /> <br />1877 <br /> <br />TABLE I. Description of sevFn precipitation echo types. <br /> <br />Precipitation <br />echo type <br /> <br />Orographic (0) <br /> <br />Area-wide (A W) <br /> <br />Embedded band <br />(EB) <br /> <br />Major band <br />(MB) <br /> <br />Convective train <br />(CT) , <br /> <br />Cellular structure <br />(>50% <br />coverage, C2) <br /> <br />Cellular structure <br />(",,50% <br />coverage, C I) <br /> <br />Description <br /> <br />An orographic echo (Fig. 2a) is a reasonably <br />uniform etho tied to the higher <br />topography. The bright band is often <br />observed in this echo, as are generating <br />cells and ~arying degrees of embedded <br />convection. <br />I <br />This echo (Fig. 2b) is so named because it <br />frequentlyl covers the entire radar scope <br />and is of much larger scale than the other <br />types, It is uniform in nature and is not <br />tied to thd higher topography. The bright <br />band is nearly always observed in <br />this PET. : <br /> <br />This feature I(Fig. 2f) is commonly observed <br />in A W or 10 echoes as elongated regions of <br />enhanced ireflectivity which generally <br />move west to east through weaker <br />surrounding echo, Motion is usually <br />normal to' the major axis of the band. <br />Reflectivities can reach 50 dB(Z) in the <br />bright barld and average rainfall rates are <br />higher thah these from any other PET, <br />I <br />The major b~nd (Fig. 2g) is a well organized <br />mesoscale I feature observed as an elongated <br />area of reflectivity with either strong <br />reflectivit~ gradients or of sufficiently large <br />scale to be easily identified. It generally <br />moves normal to its major axis. The <br />circulatiorls associated with a band often <br />suppress rjldar echoes ahead and behind it. <br /> <br />A convectivJ train (Fig. 2c) is a nonuniform <br />echo orga~ized in a line withlcellular <br />echoes tending to develop from a- single <br />generatin~ point. The point mayor may <br />not be fixed. Individual cells within CT <br />tend to prbpagate downwind as they' grow <br />along a ndarly stationary line, This echo <br />pattern is pften found only on the <br />mountain Ibarrier, but is sometimes <br />observed to exist across the entire <br />Sacramento Valley and onto the barrier. <br /> <br />This is a pattern of convective elements that <br />exist as individual cells or clusters of cells <br />(Fig. 2d) and cover more than one half of <br />an area. 4nlike the other types, coverage <br />refers to the region of convective activity <br />(as defined by radar echoes) ,and not the <br />entire American River Basin. C2 often <br />covers an ~rea similar to orographic echo <br />but is less I uniform in appearance. <br />I <br />This echo tyPe is similar to C2 except <br />coverage rhust be less than one half of the <br />region where convection is occurring <br />(Fig. 2e). : <br /> <br />types were associated with significantly different lapse <br />rates of equivalent potenti~ temperature (8e). Fig..3 <br />presents the, mean lapse rates of 8 e for each PET. The <br />profiles generally show incrJasing convective instability <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. I I <br />i.",; i J <br /> <br />,~~~~~tl:'~~'0';"i\t~io;~'i;i.~5;j".., <br /> <br />~. ... <br /> <br />from right to left as indicated by data taken from 1976- <br />77 through 1979-80. <br />The various echo types have been observed in a <br />variety of synoptic conditions, but a distinct sequence <br />of echo types is often observed in well organized cy- <br />clonic storms with their associated and well defined <br />700 mb trough passages. The occurrence of A W echoes <br />was almost entirely pretrough with a peak 5-6 h ahead <br />of trough passage. Major bands were widely distributed <br />before and after trough passage with a major peak 2 . <br />h ahead of the trough and minor peakS 1 and 3 h <br />behind the trough. The distribution of embedded bands <br />was centered on trough passage. The C 1, C2, and CT <br />echo types were post-trough phenomena with peaks <br />at 7, 4.5, and 5.5, respectively, behind the trough. <br />Orographic echoes occurred mostly post-trough with <br />a broad distribution peak 2 h after passage. <br />Because the amount of aircraft data available for <br />each PET was limited, it was decided to combine PETs <br />into three major categories. The three combinations <br />are shown in Table 2, with the respective number of <br />days that each type and combinations were flown. Ta- <br />ble 2 also shows the percentage frequency of occurrence <br />of each echo type derived from radar from five winter <br />field seasons, from 1976-77 to 1981-82, not including <br />1980-81 when there were no operations. <br />The area-wide combination (0, A W, WB) represents <br />a relatively stable subset of the seven echo types. The <br />banded subset (MB, CT) is made up of two distinct <br />echo features, which were combined based on their <br />frequent simultaneous occurrence. The cr type is very <br />unstable and the MB is a mixture of stable and unstable <br />environs. The cellular combination (C1, C2) represents <br />the unstable cumulus convective elements. <br /> <br />4. The L WC/ICC ratio <br /> <br />Magnitudes and distributions of L WC and ICC in <br />clouds can be used to help estimate opportunities for <br />augmenting precipitation at the ground. Many other <br />variables such as wind velocity and shear, cloud life- <br />times, terrain influences, and precipitation trajectories <br />need to be considered when making a complete as- <br />sessment of seeding opportunities. However, if the <br />candidate clouds have insufficient liquid water content <br />and an overabundance of ice crystals initially, the re- <br />maining considerations are academic. <br />We believe the LWC/ICC ratio is a good measure <br />of the microphysical potential for enhancing precipi- <br />tation. It is possible that when our measure of seed- <br />ability looks adequate in a given situation, other factorS <br />may still negate attempts to increase precipitation at <br />the ground.W e believe that these factors can be eval- <br />uated independently at later steps in the precipitation <br />process. <br />It is understood qualitatively by those working in <br />cloud physics and weather modification that when a <br />cloud has a large L WC it is most likely to respond to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.