My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00575
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00575
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:41:05 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:57:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Suitability of the Upper Colorado River Basin for Precipitation Management
Date
10/1/1969
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chapter I I I <br /> <br />SUITABILITY OF BASINS FOR PRECIPITATION MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />1. Criteria of suitability of basins for precipi- <br />tation management. Whether it be an experimental or a <br />large-scale operation, the proper selection of basins <br />for weather modification is important. Simply put, the <br />question to be answered is: What makes one basin more <br />suitable than another for a precipitation management <br />operation [6]? <br /> <br />From a water resource point of view, the largest <br />amount of runoff that can be brought about by cloud <br />seeding is one of the criteria of suitability. But at <br />the present time, cloud seeding is in the preliminary <br />stages, and its success still has to be measured and <br />discussed. One needs another criterion for evaluation. <br />The smallest number of years needed for significance at <br />a given level and power is the criterion from the <br />evaluation standpoint. <br /> <br />Both of the criteria above are not necessarily the <br />same and, of course, they are not absolute. In addi- <br />tion, meteorologic and economic conditions must be con- <br />sidered. However, these criteria are beyond the ob- <br />jective of this study, which is confined to hydrologic <br />suitability. <br /> <br />2. Suitability of basins for optimal water yield. <br /> <br />a. Increase of precipitation by cloud seeding. <br />Cloud seeding operations have been carried out on the <br />following assumptions [12]: <br /> <br />(1) That some cloud systems precipitate <br />inefficiently or not at all because of a deficiency of <br />ice crystals in their super-cooled regions; <br /> <br />(2) That by seeding these clouds with silver <br />iodide to increase the concentration of ice crystaLs, <br />it might be possible to produce adetectable increase in <br />precipitation or, alternatively, change its distribu- <br />tion or character; <br /> <br />(3) That nuclei leaving a ground generator <br />and carried up by convection and turbulent diffusion <br />will provide the proper concentration of ice crystals, <br />at least somewhere in the supercooled parts of the <br />cloud system; <br /> <br />(4) That the silver iodide nuclei will retain <br />their ice nucleating ability during their travel from <br />the generator to the supercooled regions of the cloud. <br /> <br />Because cloud physics and physical meteorology in <br />general have received vigorous impetus only during the <br />past decade principally from interest in cloud seeding, <br />it is still difficult to predict the extent of man- <br />made precipitation in the future. But it seems to be <br />the consensus of opinion that present technology is <br />not sufficiently developed to induce an additional <br />amount of precipitation above a small percentage (10- <br />20 percent) that occurs naturally. <br /> <br />At present it is a somewhat accepted oplnlon that <br />the increase of precipitation by cloud seeding is pro- <br />portional to the natural precipitation, i.e., <br /> <br />LIP <br />w <br /> <br />k P <br />w <br /> <br />lIPw is the expected increase of winter precipi- <br />tation by cloud seeding, <br /> <br />Pw is the natural winter precipitation, and <br /> <br />k is the ratio of increase of precipitation to <br />the natural value or relative increase. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />:;' <br /> <br />In equation (7) the average value of k might be <br />determined physically, for various meteorological and <br />geographical conditions. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />A.I <br />-I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />b. Relationship between runoff and precipitation. <br />In order to implement a plan for the best use of the <br />total manageable water supply, it is necessary to <br />understand the relationship between climate, water <br />losses, and water yield from watersheds. For this pur- <br />pose, various methods have been developed indirectly or <br />from data at hand, which are classified in the follow- <br />ing two categories: <br /> <br />(1) Prediction equation for specific yield <br />[13-16] and <br /> <br />(2) Runoff forecasting analysis [17-24]. <br /> <br />The first approach is to relate the specific yield <br />with climatologic and/or basin characteristics known to <br />influence precipitation amounts, as well as their dis- <br />position. However, most available climatologic and <br />basin data are only indices of the combined effects <br />of several physical factors. Hence, the more complex <br />statistical approaches have been applied. General <br />effects of climatologic and basin characteristics are <br />more clearly defined on an annual basis than for shorter <br />periods. <br /> <br />The second approach is to find a solution to the <br />water-budget equation which serves for water supply <br />forecasting. This approach is based largely on the <br />existence of a time lag between winter precipitation <br />stored as snow pack and spring runoff and on the greater <br />effectiveness of the winter precipitation in producing <br />runoff as compared to that which occurs during the <br />summer. <br /> <br />The atmospheric water resource project in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin aims to increase winter <br />precipitation as snow, which is followed by an increase <br />of runoff in the spring. Hence, the second approach <br />is helpful in finding the relationship between spring <br />runoff and winter precipitation and in estimating the <br />increase of runoff. <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />c. Increase of runoff. The effect of cloud seed- <br />ing is measured by the increase of usable runoff. It <br />is assumed that runoff (Q) is a function of a repre- <br />sentative precipitation (P). Then, in the general form, <br /> <br />Q = f(P) <br /> <br />(8) <br /> <br />(7) <br /> <br />But is is hard to find an integrated precipitation that <br />represents the whole basin. Suppose that the <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />~---' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.