Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Printed January 30, 1990 <br /> <br />HIPLEX-l clearly showed that dry ice seeding produces ice crystals in supercooled cumulus clouds, <br />and that the crystals grow and spread at rates agreeable with theory (slides) (Mielke et aI., 1984; <br />Cooper and Lawson, 1984). The dry ice drops produced curtains of tiny ice crystals, which spread <br />laterally at roughly 1 m.s'l on each side. In some cases the crystals grew into graupel. However, <br />cloud lifetime was a limiting factor in most of the test clouds. All of the liquid water concentrations <br />measured more than 5 minutes after seeding were far below those required for the development <br />of millimeter-size raindrops, and the precipitation that formed took the form of snow aggregates <br />rather than graupel (Cooper and Lawson, 1984). Most of the test clouds obviously failed to satisfy <br />criterion (c) for seed ability stated by the WMO. <br /> <br />Similar findings have been reported from seeding experiments on convective clouds near Thunder <br />Bay, Ontario and near Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories of Canada (Isaac et aI., 1982). In <br />those experiments, silver iodide was released from wing-mounted pyrotechnic flares as the seeding <br />aircraft penetrated the clouds at some level between -5 and _lOOC. About 40 percent of the <br />Yellowknife seeded clouds rained compared to only 12 percent of the unseeded clouds. However, <br />no rain was generated from the Thunder Bay clouds. The difference apparently was related to cloud <br />lifetimes after selection as test cases, where lifetime is defined as the time that the peak liquid <br />water concentration remained above 0.1 g.m'3. Many of the Yellowknife clouds had lifetimes of <br />15 to 30 minutes, and most of the long-lived ones rained. Only two of the Thunder Bay clouds had <br />lifetimes over 10 minutes, and many dissipated in less than 5 minutes, which is far too short a time <br />for precipitation to form. <br /> <br />A logical next step in research on convective cloud seeding would be an experiment in which the <br />capabilities developed for HIPLEX-1 and the latest numerical cloud models would be directed at <br />clouds large enough to yield appreciable rainfall at the ground. Convective cloud seeding programs <br />have been conducted at various places in Texas throughout the 1980s, including some randomized <br />trials supported by the Bureau of Reclamation. Preliminary results as reported by Rosenfeld and <br />Woodley (1989) have been quite promising, with indications of a doubling of rainfall from seeded <br />clouds. However, only a few test cases have been analyzed so far. The Illinois State Water Survey <br />has made detailed plans for a more comprehensive study, but field activity has been limited by a <br />lack of funding. <br /> <br />5. Hail Suppression <br /> <br />Hail is formed in large convective storms. They are generally classified as single-cell, rnulticell, or <br />supercelI storms. It is convenient to divide hailstone growth into two stages. The first is the growth <br />of a hail embryo about 5 mm in diameter; the second is the continued growth of the embryo to a <br />size, say 2 or 3 cm diameter, large enough to reach the ground without melting completely. Analysis <br />of hailstone trajectories suggests that embryo growth takes place in updrafts of 1 m.s.l or so, while <br />final growth may take place in updrafts of 20 or 30 m.s'l. Such a combination could be achieved <br />in a single-cell cloud with a steadily intensifying updraft, by recycling embryos in a multicell cloud, <br />or by trajectories that carry hail embryos from the outer parts of a quasisteady-state supercell cloud <br />inward toward the main updraft (Foote and Knight, 1977). <br /> <br />A number of conceptual models have been put forth to suggest how silver iodide seeding could <br />reduce hail damage; of these, the competing embryo hypothesis is considered the most promising <br /> <br />9 <br />