Laserfiche WebLink
<br />With ground-based seeding the problems of seeding coverage, controlling <br />seeding concentrations, and targeting and timing of seeding effects become <br />even more difficult to overcome. Early studies (MacCready et al., 1957b) <br />report finding silver iodide particles from ground generators in sufficient <br />concentrations to produce seeding effects as far as 48 km from their source <br />in particular situations. McPartland and Super (1978) and Heimbach and <br />Stone (1984) found that silver iodide plumes from ground generators <br />ascended to cloud base altitudes in concentrations up to several orders of <br />magnitude above background during unstable conditions favorable for convec- <br />tion. However, Heimbach and Stone (1984) showed that targeting was dif- <br />ficult and the rising plumes did not disperse as much as expected from <br />theory. Admirat and Buscaglione (1982) measured ice nuclei concentrations <br />in updrafts just below cloud base of a storm being seeded with a dense net- <br />work of ground-based silver iodide-acetone generators and found values from <br />one-to-two orders of magnitude higher than those outside the experimental <br />zone. They also proposed the concept of a SSF (Storm Seeding Factor), <br />defined as the ratio of the artificial ice nuclei concentration below the <br />cloud base of seeded storms to the natural concentrations below unseeded <br />storms, to express the concentration of effective silver iodide nuclei from <br />ground-based seeding systems that enter the storm base after diffusion, <br />transport and deactivation. The SSF was computed for a large number of <br />ground-based seeding experiments yielding values from 1 to 500, with most <br />experiments being close to 1. <br /> <br />Another significant problem with ground-based seeding and, in fact, air- <br />borne patrol seeding at cloud base altitudes is that it is non-selective, <br /> <br />25 <br />