Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />I <br />Because it is soil water and water stress, not precipitation, t~at directly <br />affect crop yield, additional precipitation that builds up soil iwater early <br />in the season will reduce or eliminate water stress and usually lead to <br />increased yield, even in years with above-normal precipitation. I Built-up <br />soil water can be especi ally important in a year with a pronounqed dry period <br />during the crucial grain-filling stage. There is evidence sugg~sting that <br />even small amounts of precipitation induced on otherwise rainles!s days may be <br />usefu"], part icul arly if there are many such days. <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />The studies also show that temperature stress and soil type can have a <br />pronounced effect on yield. Temperature stress (almost always oaused by low <br />temperatures for the sites used in this study) can offset the p~sitive effect <br />of adequate or even abundant precipitation, and it is more significant at the <br />northerly sites. Soil characteristics apparently determine, to ia large <br />extent, the relationship between an increment of precipitation ~nd an incre- <br />ment of yield. I <br /> <br />Analysis of the results from the precipitation enhancement scenarios suggests <br />that those operating on a broad spectrum of natural condition a~e~ in general, <br />more effective at increasing yield than those affecting only celltain cate90ries <br />of events. The most effective scenarios (6, 7A, and 7B) affect ~ore events, <br />which implies both more total precipitation and a greater proba~ility of <br />adding precipitation at the "right" time. These "broad spectru~" precipita- <br />tion E~nhancement scenarios also provide significant yield increases (i.e., <br />increases of at least 6 percent) in more years than the other sdenarios <br />I <br />do. I <br />I <br />I <br />Among the scenarios that operate on only certain categories of ~vents (small <br />storms, large storms, trace days, etc.), there is no consistent Itendency for <br />one scenario to produce significantly greater yield increases tHan another. <br />Year-to-year variations and site-to-site variations in yield res1ulting from <br />these scenarios seem to be a function of the number of storms, ~hich implies <br />total amount of precipitation, rather than the nature of the ev~nts themselves. <br /> <br />The results of this study have implications for both planning a~d operation <br />of precipitation enhancement projects intended to affect agriculture. A <br />major element in planning a project is development of a seedability clima-. <br />tology - that is, establishing the expected frequency of seedable events <br />according to some hypothesis and estimating the amount of additional precipi- <br />tation that would result from seeding. Our studies show that there is a <br />trade--off between timing and amount (though not explored quantit11ativelY) such <br />that the same yield can be achieved by adding a moderate amount of precipita- <br />tion near the start of grain filling or by adding a large amount[ earlier in <br />the season. Therefore, t he expected impact of a prec i pitat ion enh ancement <br />project should consider both the amount of precipitation likely [to be achieved <br />and the timing of that precipitation relative to plant growth and development. <br />It should be noted that optimal times for additional precipitatilon vary among <br />different crops. Planners should focus on the principal crop(s)1 of the <br />project area and, to the extent possible, tailor the project to Ithe crop, not <br />the weather. Planners should also recognize that varying soil types will <br />affect the transferability of expectations from one area to ano~her, even <br />when the areas are close and the climatologies similar. In addi1tion, the <br /> <br />27 <br />