Laserfiche WebLink
<br />about the same amount of rain, but 1969 received most of its rain at the <br />start of grain filling - at a good time. The rains in 1955 occurred late in <br />the grain-filling period - a relatively poor time. <br /> <br />At San Angelo, both 1948 and 1963 (figs. 8a and 8b) received the same total <br />rain, but 1963 received about 20 mm less growi ng-season rain. In stage 6, <br />1963 had about 30 mm less rain than 1948, yet its yield was markedly higher <br />(6950 kg/ha vs. 6214 kg/ha for 1948). This is because the 1963 rains were <br />clustered about the beginning of grain filling, while the 1948 rains came <br />very close to- maturity. <br /> <br />Figures 9a and 9b exempl ify the interact ion between t imi ng and amoun't of <br />precipitation. In 1966 and in 1976, Concordia received rainfall around the <br />beginning of grain filling. However, in 1966, the rainfall was much greater, <br />resulting in a yield 2200 kg/ha higher (4347 kg/ha vs. 3135 kg/ha). <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.! <br /> <br />Several pairs of precipitation enhancement scenarios that had similar increases <br />in precipitation but different yields for a given year were examined. The <br />results confirm those from examination of natural-conditions pairs, .i .e., <br />that timing of the additional precipitation usually accounted for the differ- <br />ence in yield. . <br /> <br />CONCLUS IONS <br /> <br />This study used a daily growth and development model of a grain sorghum plant <br />to examine the effects of amount and timing of enhanced precipitation on crop <br />yield. The model was exercised both with observed daily values of precipita- <br />tion and temperature and with precipitation values increased according to 15 <br />enhancement scenarios at each of five sites in the central and southern High <br />Plains (17 to 32 years of record per site). The results indicate that, in <br />most years, the dominant factor affecting sorghum yield is the total. amount <br />of precipitation during the period at least 2 months prior to planting <br />through to crop maturity. In general, the greater the precipitation, the <br />greater the yield. The precipitation enhancement scenarios also show that <br />the greater the increase in precipitation, the greater the increase in <br />yi e 1 d. <br /> <br />The relationship between precipitation pattern and yield was examined to <br />assess the effectiveness of additional preclpitation at particular times <br />during the study period. Years with precipitation near the start of grain <br />filling (early in stage 6) usually have yields greater than would b~ expected <br />from their total precipitation. In general, for a given amount of precipita- <br />tion, the closer a precipitation event is to the start of grain filling, the <br />greater the effect on yield. Precipitation at this time builds up soil water <br />(which in turn reduces water stress) during the period when evapotranspiration <br />is at a maximum and when most of the photosynthate goes to grain rather than <br />to leaves or other plant parts. Conversely, the absence~of_ precipitation <br />near the start of grain filling usually results in lower than expected yield. <br />In some years, timing of precipitation is the key factor determining yield, <br />and optimal timing can result in a near-normal yield in a year with below- <br />normal precipitation. Above-normal precipitation coupled with rain near the <br />start of grain filling usually results in the highest yields. <br /> <br />'i. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />24 <br />