My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00570
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:41:01 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:56:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Precipitation Enhancement Effects of Sorghum, Using a Daily Growth Model
Date
4/1/1982
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The rank correlations between mean normalized precipitation and mean normal- <br />ized yield for the 11 scenarios were calculated for Lubbock and Goodland. <br />The coefficient for Lubbock is 0.87 and is 0.98 for Goodland, again showing <br />the strong relationship between additional precipitation and increased yield. <br />Most of the yi e 1 ds at the other three sites were in the noi se, and corre 1 a- <br />tion coefficients would have questionable significance. <br /> <br />Interpretation of the practical significance of these scenarios requires <br />assumptions about the noise level of the model (arbitrarily set at 5 percent) <br />and the yield increase that must be realized in an actual sorghum field <br />before it can be detected above the natural variations in agricultural <br />production. This latter value has also been set, arbitrarily, at 5 percent. <br />We can now estimate (1) the frequency with which each scenario can provide a <br />"real" increase in yield (i .e., 6 percent or more) and (2) the amount of <br />additional precipitation needed to achieve this "rea'" yield increase. <br /> <br />Only Scenarios 7A and 7B produced yield increases averaging 6 percent or more <br />at all five sites, and Scenario 6 produced "significant" average increases at <br />Goodland, Oklahoma City, and Lubbock. However, examination of the detailed <br />results show that, although a given scenario may have a small effect on yield <br />in the mean, it may still produce significant yield increases in some years. <br />Table 5 shows the number and percent of years that yield increases were above <br />the assumed noise level of 5 percent. <br /> <br />:.1.: <br /> <br />The above analyses give the average yield increase for each scenario. We <br />al so looked at the average preci pitat ion increase associ ated with a :6-percent <br />increase in yield. "To estimate this threshold precipitation amount, the <br />precipitation increases for all scenarios in years with 5-, 6-, and 7-percent <br />increases in yield were averaged for each site (table 6). These numbers were <br />compared with the mean scenario increases from table 4. For the purpose of <br />this exercise, it is assumed that a scenario is "effective" if the mean pre- <br />cipitation increase is equal to or greater than the mean precipitation needed <br />to achieve a 6-percent (average) yield increase. Scenarios 7A and 7B are <br />effective at all five sites, and scenarios 4B, 5B, 6, and 8 are effective at <br />four of the five sites. Scenarios lB, 2, and 5A are effective only at <br />Lubbock, and Scenarios 3A and 3B are ineffective at all sites. <br /> <br />Timing <br /> <br />Precipitation in particular periods during plant growth and development is <br />especially important. For grain sorghum, moisture stress is critical in the <br />period of floral bud development and very critical in the heading period <br />(Neild, 1975). These periods are within stages 5 and 6 of the sorghum model, <br />and table 3 shows the rank correlation coefficients between stage precipita- <br />tion and yield for all five sites. For stages 5, 6, and 5 and 6 combined, <br />the coefficients range from low to moderate; only 8 of the 15 values in the <br />table are statistically significant at the 5-percent level. These results <br />indicate that the crucial periods for additional precipitation are shorter <br />than, or perhaps overlap, the phenological stages of plant development. <br /> <br />To narrow the time span, we arbitrarily selected the 2-week period from <br />7 days before the start of grain filling to 7 days after the start. Lubbock <br />was used because it generally shows the greatest correspondence between <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />€- <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.