Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Basin <br /> <br /> <br />COlorado River <br /> <br />the Upper <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />WOSA <br /> <br />THE STORM SYSTEMS that pass through the region in the winter <br />take different paths and have different speeds, but they normally <br />move from west to east. The most frequent storm path is to the <br />north of Colorado. In such storms, the winds may blowout of <br />the west over Colorado for several days. Snow falls on the moun- <br />tain ranges that run from north to south. A second situation oc- <br />curs with well-developed storms that pass directly through <br />Colorado. The low level winds are initially from the south, but <br />later turn to the west and northwest. In general, the snowfall <br />amounts from such storms are large over most of the region. A <br />third type of storm often remains stationary for several days, <br />centered in Nevada or northern Arizona. These storms have <br />winds from the southwest over Colorado. They bring relatively <br />warm moist air over areas such as the San Juan Mountains in <br />southwest Colorado, causing heavy snowfall. <br /> <br />Storm Tracks and Weather Patterns <br /> <br />In any given storm, snow occurs first in the western part of the <br />region and gradually moves eastward. When snow is falling <br />over the Rockies, the Plains States to the east are normally not <br />experiencing precipitation and may even have clear skies. How- <br />ever, when the low-pressure center passes onto the plains, the <br />storm may regenerate by drawing in warm moist air from the <br />south. This air originally comes from the Gulf of Mexico. A new <br />storm center may form southeast of Colorado that can bring <br />large amounts of snow to the plains. <br /> <br />15 J <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />SNOWPACK, CLOUD-'SEEDlNG, AND THE COLORADO RIVER <br />variations in snowfall for different storms, of the. same storm <br />in different areas. <br />Statistical methods would not be suitable for a full-scale <br />WOSA whose goal was water production because they would <br />halve the amount of water produced. To evaluate full-scale <br />WOSA results, we could learn enough about the processes that <br />affect precipitation so that the variability in precipitation in an <br />area could be explained to some extent by physical principles. <br />Some. aspects of the growth of ice crystals, and the expected <br />snowfall patterns, could be stated as mathematical formulas that <br />include a simplified representation of terrain, seeding nuclei <br />distributions, and meteorological conditions (such as moisture <br />content and wind speed). The expected precipitation could be <br />computed and compared with the actual measured results. Over <br />time, the set of formulas (the model) would be adjusted until it <br />could predict how much snow would fall with and without seed- <br />ing, as determined by the statistical methods mentioned. <br />This very promising approach to the evaluation of an <br />operational program is not yet a proven method. With the im- <br />provements that are coming along in our ability to measure <br />snowfall accurately over a large area, the overall evaluation of <br />a water productionWOSA program will soon be possible. How- <br />ever, even if we can assess the effect of seeding over a large area <br />for a given storm, or the effect of seeding over a smaller area <br />for an entire winter season, we will not be able to say how seed- <br />ing affected a single storm at a specific spot. It will be necessary <br />to calibrate each target area initially, and perhaps periodically, <br />using the statistical procedures described above. <br />14 I <br /> <br />("Ie <br /> <br />"+ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />"1 <br />. I <br />\ <br />