Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WEATHER MODlFICA nON <br /> <br />What do the people who might be affected think about it and <br />how would they act to protect their interests? r <br /> <br />What conditions can be put. upon the project so that the un- <br />desirable effects can be minimized, redistributed, or compen- <br />sated for by purposely redistributing benefits? <br /> <br />Given sufficiently detailed answers to these questions, we can <br />all make sound decisions about what the WOSA program should <br />be. <br />However, we will probably not be asked to participate in <br />very many of the decisions that are made every day that can <br />affect the quality of our lives. We have to use the means that we <br />have in different situations to make our voices heard by the <br />decision maker. The citizen has formal political channels to <br />express his concerns, but he also has many informal channels. <br />He can band together with persons of similar interests to offer a <br />stronger voice. We have all seen many recent examples of the <br />~~~~..;.,o~o~~ ~f .--..h1,,, .,,,t,,...n TTnT""" r;t;7pn" milk-". th".ir voice~ <br />~1J.~""LJ. v\.;~~'"'.::).::) VL .t'LJ.L1~~"" U.......L.&.V~.L. .......L.L.Lvu..... ..................................&.i..o ............-...--' .......~-'-- . -_../_~ <br /> <br />heard, the pliblic official will continue to make his decisions <br />based upon his perceptions of society's needs and interests. Over <br />time, these can become highly colored by the special interests <br />who take the time and spend the money to make their desires <br />known. If we work at it, there is no reason why average citizens <br />cannot promote the public interest just as effectively as lobby- <br />ists and trade groups promote special interests. <br />The purpose of technology assessmentis to inform those <br />who help to make decisions concerning the development and <br />application of technology of the consequences of the different <br />kinds of decisions that they might make. Technology assess- <br />ment will improve the public official's understanding of the <br />public's needs and interests, so that he can make decisions based <br />upon a broader range of interests. Technology assessment will <br />put the public in a better position to make concerns known in a <br />responsible and informed way. Concerns that are expressed in: <br />this way will be difficult to overlook at the level at which the <br />decision is finally made. . <br /> <br />SNOWPACK, CLOUD-SEEDING, AND THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />This reaction is probably the result of widespread experience <br />with many technical innovations that were enthusiastically <br />adopted based upon an initial reaction to a need. Because we <br />have often been disappointed by undesirable effects that were <br />not foreseen, we have learned to respond to a proposal such as <br />WOSA with a certain skepticism. <br />There seem to be two ways of dealing with any problems <br />that an operational WOSA program in the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin might create. We can try to foresee the problems <br />and set conditions that would minimize them, or we can deal <br />With the problems as they occur. We can avoid some problems <br />if we ban the development or application of a technology that <br />produces problems. If the project is stopped, the benefits are <br />also lost. Only one way of dealing with potential problems shows <br />any real promise: to anticipate the problems and then build the <br />means and the motivation for minimizing them into the institu- <br />tions that will develop and apply the technology. <br />One might ask how we go about developing a sociaUy <br />responsible WOSA program. First, we need to develop certain <br />information about the program and the possible ways it might <br />be implemented: <br /> <br />How does WOSA work, how effective will it be, and What will <br />it cost? What effects will the additional snowfall cause? What <br />will it do to the river flows and to the quality of the water? Can <br />it be controlled so that any hazardous conditions will be mini- <br />mized? Are there other ways of achieving the same effect? <br /> <br />What conditions would be put upon it by existing public <br />policy? What problems wotildbe solved or created by the laws <br />and institutions that exist for dealing with weather modification <br />and its effects, or the water supply that it would create in the <br />Colorado River Basin? <br /> <br />Who stands to gain and who stands to lose from WOSA and <br />how much? Is it on balance a worthwhile project? <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />What will it do to the environment directly and indirectly and <br />how will this affect living things, including man? <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />il. <br /> <br />~ <br />~: <br />'~: <br />~! <br /> <br />t., <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />F" <br />\ <br />I <br />'f <br />. " <br />, l <br /> <br />.. <br />