My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00567
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00567
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:58 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:56:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
A Report on Winter Snowpack-Augmentation
Date
11/11/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Bulletin American Meteorological Society <br /> <br />mean cloud depth of 2 km this value converts to an average <br />liquid-water content of less than 0.1 g . m ~3. Higher liquid- <br />water contents thus occur infrequently. At all three field sites <br />the SLW is concentrated in the lowest kilometer above the <br />barrier at temperatures of from 0 to - 100C (Heggli and Rauber <br />1988; Rogers et at 1986; Boe and Super 1986; Rauber et at <br />1986). All three programs report that SLW, when it is present, <br />is highly variable in space and time due to the variability of <br />orographic flow over complex terrain and the convective nature <br />of the cloud. However, SLW on the average can exist from 6 <br />to longer than 48 hours. Values above 0.3 mm normally last <br />for only 6 to 10 hours. However, it is felt that even three hours <br />is sufficient time to ready seeding systems (ground or aerial) <br />and allow sufficient time for seeding within these SLW op- <br />portunities. <br />Developing techniques to predict SLW occurrence (oppor- <br />tunity recognition) is needed, especially if the best opportunities <br />occur during only 10 to 15 percent of the time SLW is observed. <br />Reynolds and Kuciauskas (1988) provide examples of the utility <br />of satellite and radar remote sensing in providing several hours <br />of lead time for cloud-seeding activities to be initiated during <br />these higher SLW periods. Satellite and radar observations are <br />useful because during the transformation of deep stable clouds <br />into more shallow orographic clouds, distinct differences in <br />cloud-top temperature can be seen in satellite infrared imagery <br />and the associated rainbands can be tracked in radar displays. <br />Diurnal and seasonal trends in SLW, as has been observed <br />in SCPP, also occur. Lee (1988) has shown that higher observed <br />SLW exists during the night than during daylight hours. His <br />results are based on radiometer, mountain top-icing data, and <br />rawinsonde data that infer a higher frequency of saturated layers <br />near the surface at night. Rangno (1986) alludes to this diurnal <br />trend based upon his observations of winter mountain clouds. <br />He suggests that cloud bases descend at night while cloud-top <br />heights increase, leading to higher frequencies of water-satu- <br />rated clouds near the mountain. The observations suggest a <br />higher potential for ground-based seeding at night than during <br />the day. <br />Regarding seasonal or monthly trends, one may now ask <br />what the potential seeding opportunities are in normal to below- <br />normal precipitation periods. One may consider as an index to <br />seedability, icing occurrence at mountain-top level as measured <br />by an automatic icing-rate meter (Henderson and Solak <br />1983), or by direct measurements of rime icing (Hindman 1986). <br />Figure 6 shows for the past two winters monthly precipitation <br />as a percentage of normal at Blue Canyon, California, a re- <br />cording gauge site at the 1500-m level in the central Sierra <br />Nevada. It also shows the number of "icing trips"3 logged at <br />Squaw Peak at the 2700-m level on the crest of the Sierra <br />Nevada. <br />Figure 6 shows an extreme example of a wet month and dry <br />month having similar icing. February 1986 precipitation for <br />that site was 411 percent of the normal precipitation; December <br />1986 precipitation was only 22 percent of the normal precip- <br />itation. In general, the figure shows similar icing events for <br /> <br />. 3 An icing trip is defined as one transmission from the sensor initiated <br />when a specified mass of ice collects on the sensing element. Each <br />transmission, or trip, is followed by a brief heating cycle which melts <br />the ice and prepares the instrument for further observations. A maxi- <br />mum of three trips can occur in a five minute period. <br /> <br />1293 <br /> <br />average to below-normal months as well as excessively wet <br />months. This data implies that for certain dry months, storms <br />may be frequent but produce much less precipitation. As dis- <br />cussed earlier in this section, it is the weak or weakening <br />portions of storms that produce substantial periods of SLW. <br />The significance of this phenomenon is that seeding may well <br />be possible when it is most needed. A much longer record <br />period is required to confirm this, however. Super and Heim- <br />bach (1988) also show that considerable potential for increasing <br />snowpack is present in well below normal snowfall seasons. <br />This potential, however, may not be present in drought years, <br />such as 1976-1977 when almost no storms effected the western <br />U.S. <br />By way of review, the shallow orographic cloud, considered <br />the best candidate for winter snowpack augmentation, is de- <br />scribed in figure 7. The figure shows fairly low concentrations <br />of liquid water, within the lowest kilometer above the barrier, <br />at temperatures of from 00 to - 100e. There is some tendency <br />for a nighttime maximum and for possibly significant periods <br />of SLW to occur even during below-normal precipitation pe- <br />riods. <br /> <br />-C <br /> <br /> 100 <br /> 90 <br />(I) <br />Cl <br />III 80 <br />- <br />c:: <br />(I) 70 <br />() <br />.. <br />(I) <br />Q. 60 <br />(I) <br />> 50 <br />:;:: <br />III <br />'5 40 <br />E <br />:;, <br />0 30 <br /> 20 <br /> 10 <br /> 0 <br /> <br /> <br />85% < .2mm <br /> <br />... Utah Long (1 987) <br />. Colorado Super et al (1986) <br />. California Heggli & Rauber (1987) <br /> <br />o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 <br />10 20 30 40 50 60 70 '80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 <br />Integrated Liquid Water (mm) <br /> <br />FIG. 5. Cumulative distribution of integrated supercooled liquid <br />water as measured by a vertically pointing microwave radiometer at <br />various field site locations noted. Averaging interval varied from 15 <br />min (Utah) to I h (Colorado and California). <br /> <br />120 D Precipitation <br /> . Icing Trips 400 <br />100 411% <br /> 1200 <br />80 1000 <br />60 800 <br /> 600 <br />40 <br /> 400 <br />20 200 <br /> <br /> <br />FEB 86 JAN 86 FEB 87 MAR 87 JAN 87 DEe 86 NOV 86 <br /> <br />FIG. 6. Monthly precipitation and percent of nonnal at Blue <br />Canyon, CA, and icing trips at Squaw Peak from ETI (1987). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.