Laserfiche WebLink
<br />[Reprinted from BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, VoL 69, No. II, November 1988] <br />Printed in U. S. A. <br /> <br />David W. Reynolds <br /> <br />A Report on Winter Snowpack-Augmentation <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation, <br />Auburn, California <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />Cloud seeding to increase winter snowpacks over mountainous regions <br />ofthe western United States have been in existence for almost 40 years. <br />However, our understanding of the physical processes taking place in <br />the clouds in response to this seeding and the expected precipitation <br />increases are still subjects of great scientific interest and investigation. <br />Recent field observations that have emphasized direct physical obser- <br />vations of winter clouds, their structure and liquid water content, as <br />well as their response to the injection of glaciogenic seeding agents <br />have added to our knowledge. These physical observations are helping <br />to provide some insight into the mechanisms of precipitation increases, <br />inferred from statistical analyses, that have been reported in certain <br />winter orographic cloud seeding programs. This paper attempts to com- <br />pare physical and statistical results, to show consistency, and to help <br />provide limits to what one might expect when winter snowpack aug- <br />mentation is applied within suitable cloud systems. <br /> <br />1. Introduction <br /> <br />Shortly after the discovery of the utility of dry ice and silver <br />iodide as cloud seeding agents, Bergeron (1949) presented a <br />conceptual model of their use for increasing winter snowpack <br />on mountain ranges. Subsequent reviews of the physical basis <br />of orographic snowpack augmentation have revealed increas- <br />ingly sophisticated views of the physical processes involved <br />(e.g. Ludlam 1955; Grant and Kahan 1974; and Elliott 1986). <br />This paper wil1 compare results from two separate types of <br />winter snow pack augmentation field programs. The first type, <br />referred to as "statistical," are projects designed to determine <br />the increases in snowfal1 within a predefined target area using <br />randomized seeding methods. Given sufficient sample sizes, <br />researchers hope to obtain from these projects statistical1y sig- <br />nificant results on the precipitation increases produced. The <br />second type, referred to as "physical," are those projects whose <br />main objective is to determine the natural precipitation pro- <br />cesses taking place in wintertime clouds over the region and <br />how these processes might be augmented through seeding. A <br />strong emphasis is placed on determining the temporal and <br />spatial distribution of supercooled liquid water (SLW) in these <br />clouds. Secondly, by using direct, physical measurements, the <br />effects of seeding are tracked, from release of the seeding <br />material in cloud, through the growth of the seeded particles <br />to precipitation size, and until subsequent fal10ut on the surface. <br />With this tracking approach, cal1ed the "physical-links-in-the- <br />chain" approach, a multitude of parameters are measured along <br />this chain. The statistical programs, in contrast, measure pre- <br />cipitation amounts only. <br />Fortunately, the physical experiments were conducted in close <br /> <br />@ 1988 American Meteorological Society <br /> <br />I <br />1.-.-.... I <br /> <br />1290 <br /> <br />proXlITllty to the statistical projects. The results from these <br />physical studies (listed in table 1) are used to provide scientific <br />plausibility for the statistical results reported. (For a further <br />description of these two different types of experiments see <br />El1iott [1986]). <br />CLIMAX (Mielke et at 1981), a randomized, ground-based <br />seeding program that operated during the 1960s in the central <br />Colorado Rockies, has reported statistical1y significant in- <br />creases in snow pack through cloud seeding. CRADP (Colorado <br />River Augmentation Demonstration Program) and COSE (Col- <br />orado Orographic Seeding Experiment), conducted in the early <br />to mid-1980s, provides supporting physical observations to the <br />CLIMAX statistical results. <br />The Bridger Range experiment was an exploratory, random- <br />ized cloud-seeding experiment conducted in southwestern Mon- <br />tana dllring the winters of 1970-71 and 1971-72. This project <br />also reported statistical1y significant increases in snowpack <br />through ground-based seeding (Super and Heimbach 1983; Super <br />1986). Much later, detailed physical observations w.ere made <br />at this same location in an attempt to provide direct physical <br />observations of the seeding affects (Super and Heimbach 1988). <br />The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) of Califor- <br />nia, since the early 1950s, has been conducting an ongoing, <br />long-tl~rm randomized, winter cloud-seeding program near Lake <br />Almanor (Mooney and Lunn 1969). From 1976 to 1987, the <br />Bureau of Reclamation's Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project (SCPP) <br />(Reynolds and Dennis 1986) was conducted some 75 miles to <br />the south of the PG&E program site, making extensive physical <br />observations within natural and seeded wintertime clouds. Fig- <br />ure 1 shows the location of these programs. <br />Major observations from five physical1y based programs listed <br />in table 1 wil1 be reviewed. In particular, both the distribution <br />of SLW and its relationship to storm structure and organization, <br />as well as the observed temporal and spatial variability of SLW, <br />will be discussed. A physical basis for seeding and the advan- <br />tages and disadvantages of various seeding (treatment) methods <br />will be reviewed in the context of both the directly observed <br />and statistical1y inferred seeding increases reported. <br />Final1y, the importance of numerical modeling studies in <br />providing insight and guidance into the conduct of snowpack <br />augmentation programs will be reviewed and suggestions of <br />the direction for future field studies will be provided. <br /> <br />2. Supercooled liquid water studies <br /> <br />According to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) <br />(1982), a cloud is considered to be seedable for increasing <br />precipitation if (a) the collision-coalescence process between <br />cloud drops is inefficient, (b) the rate of formation of super- <br />cooled condensate exceeds 'or is comparable to the rate of de- <br />pletion of supercooled water, and (c) there is sufficient time <br /> <br />Vol. 69, No. 11, November 1988 <br />