<br />[Reprinted from BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, VoL 69, No. II, November 1988]
<br />Printed in U. S. A.
<br />
<br />David W. Reynolds
<br />
<br />A Report on Winter Snowpack-Augmentation
<br />
<br />Bureau of Reclamation,
<br />Auburn, California
<br />
<br />Abstract
<br />
<br />I
<br />i
<br />
<br />Cloud seeding to increase winter snowpacks over mountainous regions
<br />ofthe western United States have been in existence for almost 40 years.
<br />However, our understanding of the physical processes taking place in
<br />the clouds in response to this seeding and the expected precipitation
<br />increases are still subjects of great scientific interest and investigation.
<br />Recent field observations that have emphasized direct physical obser-
<br />vations of winter clouds, their structure and liquid water content, as
<br />well as their response to the injection of glaciogenic seeding agents
<br />have added to our knowledge. These physical observations are helping
<br />to provide some insight into the mechanisms of precipitation increases,
<br />inferred from statistical analyses, that have been reported in certain
<br />winter orographic cloud seeding programs. This paper attempts to com-
<br />pare physical and statistical results, to show consistency, and to help
<br />provide limits to what one might expect when winter snowpack aug-
<br />mentation is applied within suitable cloud systems.
<br />
<br />1. Introduction
<br />
<br />Shortly after the discovery of the utility of dry ice and silver
<br />iodide as cloud seeding agents, Bergeron (1949) presented a
<br />conceptual model of their use for increasing winter snowpack
<br />on mountain ranges. Subsequent reviews of the physical basis
<br />of orographic snowpack augmentation have revealed increas-
<br />ingly sophisticated views of the physical processes involved
<br />(e.g. Ludlam 1955; Grant and Kahan 1974; and Elliott 1986).
<br />This paper wil1 compare results from two separate types of
<br />winter snow pack augmentation field programs. The first type,
<br />referred to as "statistical," are projects designed to determine
<br />the increases in snowfal1 within a predefined target area using
<br />randomized seeding methods. Given sufficient sample sizes,
<br />researchers hope to obtain from these projects statistical1y sig-
<br />nificant results on the precipitation increases produced. The
<br />second type, referred to as "physical," are those projects whose
<br />main objective is to determine the natural precipitation pro-
<br />cesses taking place in wintertime clouds over the region and
<br />how these processes might be augmented through seeding. A
<br />strong emphasis is placed on determining the temporal and
<br />spatial distribution of supercooled liquid water (SLW) in these
<br />clouds. Secondly, by using direct, physical measurements, the
<br />effects of seeding are tracked, from release of the seeding
<br />material in cloud, through the growth of the seeded particles
<br />to precipitation size, and until subsequent fal10ut on the surface.
<br />With this tracking approach, cal1ed the "physical-links-in-the-
<br />chain" approach, a multitude of parameters are measured along
<br />this chain. The statistical programs, in contrast, measure pre-
<br />cipitation amounts only.
<br />Fortunately, the physical experiments were conducted in close
<br />
<br />@ 1988 American Meteorological Society
<br />
<br />I
<br />1.-.-.... I
<br />
<br />1290
<br />
<br />proXlITllty to the statistical projects. The results from these
<br />physical studies (listed in table 1) are used to provide scientific
<br />plausibility for the statistical results reported. (For a further
<br />description of these two different types of experiments see
<br />El1iott [1986]).
<br />CLIMAX (Mielke et at 1981), a randomized, ground-based
<br />seeding program that operated during the 1960s in the central
<br />Colorado Rockies, has reported statistical1y significant in-
<br />creases in snow pack through cloud seeding. CRADP (Colorado
<br />River Augmentation Demonstration Program) and COSE (Col-
<br />orado Orographic Seeding Experiment), conducted in the early
<br />to mid-1980s, provides supporting physical observations to the
<br />CLIMAX statistical results.
<br />The Bridger Range experiment was an exploratory, random-
<br />ized cloud-seeding experiment conducted in southwestern Mon-
<br />tana dllring the winters of 1970-71 and 1971-72. This project
<br />also reported statistical1y significant increases in snowpack
<br />through ground-based seeding (Super and Heimbach 1983; Super
<br />1986). Much later, detailed physical observations w.ere made
<br />at this same location in an attempt to provide direct physical
<br />observations of the seeding affects (Super and Heimbach 1988).
<br />The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) of Califor-
<br />nia, since the early 1950s, has been conducting an ongoing,
<br />long-tl~rm randomized, winter cloud-seeding program near Lake
<br />Almanor (Mooney and Lunn 1969). From 1976 to 1987, the
<br />Bureau of Reclamation's Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project (SCPP)
<br />(Reynolds and Dennis 1986) was conducted some 75 miles to
<br />the south of the PG&E program site, making extensive physical
<br />observations within natural and seeded wintertime clouds. Fig-
<br />ure 1 shows the location of these programs.
<br />Major observations from five physical1y based programs listed
<br />in table 1 wil1 be reviewed. In particular, both the distribution
<br />of SLW and its relationship to storm structure and organization,
<br />as well as the observed temporal and spatial variability of SLW,
<br />will be discussed. A physical basis for seeding and the advan-
<br />tages and disadvantages of various seeding (treatment) methods
<br />will be reviewed in the context of both the directly observed
<br />and statistical1y inferred seeding increases reported.
<br />Final1y, the importance of numerical modeling studies in
<br />providing insight and guidance into the conduct of snowpack
<br />augmentation programs will be reviewed and suggestions of
<br />the direction for future field studies will be provided.
<br />
<br />2. Supercooled liquid water studies
<br />
<br />According to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
<br />(1982), a cloud is considered to be seedable for increasing
<br />precipitation if (a) the collision-coalescence process between
<br />cloud drops is inefficient, (b) the rate of formation of super-
<br />cooled condensate exceeds 'or is comparable to the rate of de-
<br />pletion of supercooled water, and (c) there is sufficient time
<br />
<br />Vol. 69, No. 11, November 1988
<br />
|