My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00566
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:57 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:56:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Snowpack Augmentation in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado
Date
1/1/1989
State
CO
Country
United States
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table 1 lists stakeholder groups identified in the Weisbecker study as affected by <br />WQSA. Interviews with stakeholders showed that communities at high elevations, <br />environmentalists, loggers, mining interests, and those involved in summer tourism <br />were opposed to WQSA. Some farmers and ranchers and ski area operators were <br />unsure. Those in favor included chambers of commerce, electric power people, <br />water boards representing agriculture and conservancy districtr and the U.S. <br />Forest Service. Concerns expressed at that time included the following: <br /> <br />o more avalanche, <br />o more unintended snow on residents in downwind areas, <br />o increased snow removal costs, <br />o snow preventing employees from getting to work, <br />o heavier snow loads on roofs, <br />o spring flooding, <br />o adverse effects on logging operations, and <br />o shortened summer tourist season. <br /> <br />Weisbecker's recommendations concerning compensation of mountain area communi- <br />ties were published at the end of the five-year CRBPP project, so they. were <br />never implemented in the San Juan area by the federal government. Nor was com- <br />pensation ever provided during subsequent private cloud seeding operations in the <br />area. <br /> <br />Lambright8 traced the development of cloud seeding in Colorado, particularly in its <br />political context, and touched on the use of snowpack augmentation in the San <br />Juan area during the winter 1976 emergency snow drought relief operations spon- <br />sored by the State 'of Colorado. However, Lambright focused on state level de- <br />cision making and did not attempt to assess local area response to the technology. <br /> <br />Community response in Southwestern Colorado was studied in the early 1970s as <br />part of the Comparative Study of Public Acceptance and Rejection of Weather <br />Modification Technologies by the Institute of Behavioral Science at the University <br />of Colorado and later at a private research firm in Boulder.9,1O However, the <br />results of the monitoring of public response in the San Juans were not published at <br />that time. Colorado State University researchers revisited the area in 1987, <br />interviewed 30 community leaders or persons known to have some interest in this <br />issue--representing the range of stakeholder interests, and collected news clippings, <br />reports and other documentation concerning community response. The case study <br />reported here, then, is based on data collected during ,both the early 1970s and the <br />1987 studies. <br /> <br />Back2round ' <br /> <br />The Continental Divide winds through Southwestern Colorado, crowning a branch of <br />the Rocky Mountains called the San Juans. Several 14,OOO-foot peaks tower over <br />the region, bypassed by 10,000-foot passes along Highway 550--"The Million Dollar <br />Highway"--between Durango at the southern and Ouray at the northern boundaries <br />of the mountain range. The highway between these towns traverses some of the <br />most stunning scenery in the United States, and in the wintertime is notoriously <br />avalanche-prone. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />E . <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.