My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00564
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00564
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:56 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:56:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Snow Accumulation Algorithm for the WSR-80D Radar: Supplemental Report
Date
11/1/1999
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Increasing the minimum reflectivity threshold (DBZMIN) from 4 to 15 or 20 dBZ reduced much of the <br />real precipitation yet did not fully solve the virga problem in the test cases, such as 18 November 1998 at <br />KMPX. For several weeks, Reclamation used 10 dBZ, but that was too large for the arctic storm of 2-3 <br />January 1999 (see section 3.2). In mid-January, DBZMIN was reset to 4 dBZ, the minimum threshold <br />available in the NIDS data in clear air mode. <br /> <br />The profile diagrams provided an insight to the solution of the virga problem. A virga sensing cylindrical <br />volume was defined in a new set of adaptable parameters: TOPIN, the top height - default 1.5 km above <br />the radar; BOTIN, the bottom height - default 0.2 km above the radar; INSIDE, rang(~ - default 100 km; <br />and FRACTION - default 0.05. The SAA op~~rates normally throughout ranges out to the INSIDE range. <br />When the fraction of radar bins within the cylinder, having a reflectivity of at least DBZMIN, is at least <br />FRACTION, the SAA also accumulates S beyond the INSIDE range and applies the range correction <br />there. Otherwise, beyond INSIDE, the SAA ignores all reflectivities. If the echoes cannot get down <br />below the TOPIN altitude, it is likely that measurable snow is not be reaching the ground. This <br />procedure may result in a sharp discontinuity in the S and SD products at the INSIDE range. Such a <br />discontinuity should alert an analyst that virga was involved and that the results at farther range may be <br />unreliable. <br /> <br />After the precipitation coverage within the cyJlinder has decreased to less than FRACTION, accu- <br />mulations (with range correction) are allowed at ranges greater than INSIDE for a time, DURATION. <br />Storms moving away from the radar can thereby continue to contribute to accumulations at ranges <br />beyond INSIDE. No value is suggested for DURATION, although a value of 1 to 3 hours is reasonable. <br />It is not possible to use the HINDSITE file to recover past potential accumulations for a similar time <br />before the first qualification because that file contains only accumulations, not reflectivities. <br /> <br />The virga sensing cylinder was used on both iatense storms and obvious virga for some November storms <br />at KABR, KMVX, and KMPX. The suggested values (with DURATION = 0.0) produced no obvious <br />change to major accumulations of snow over 24-hour periods. Virga was essentially eliminated in the <br />other cases. There may be cases in which some far-range virga may be integrated because there are some <br />real precipitating echoes within the qualifying cylinder. Such will often be detectable by a discontinuity <br />in the accumulations at the range INSIDE. Therefore the algorithm change is not perfect. The coding <br />has not been added to either version (Level II .or Level ill - NIDS) of the operational SAA because <br />further testing (of this virga sensing cylinder and perhaps alternate schemes) should be pursued. The <br />coding changes are given in Appendix C. <br /> <br />7.5 Reports and Publications <br /> <br />Arlin Super and I wrote a paper about the SAA, but it was not accepted for publication. It was patterned <br />after the PPS Algorithm paper published by Fulton et al. (1998), and it was submitted to the same journal <br />for publication. However, all three of the journal's reviewers wanted a different style, not a companion <br />paper. Furthermore, they wanted a major evaluation program to justify the accuracy of the SAA, not <br />recognizing that we were indeed presenting such calibrations from field studies at Denver, Albany, <br />Cleveland, and Minneapolis. We expressed our regrets and did not revise our work. <br /> <br />Our SAA work was reported at a GCIP meeting at the University of Maryland (17-18 May 1999) and at <br />QPE Workshops in Boulder, Colorado (14 April 1999), and Reno, Nevada (11 June 1999). <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.