Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" .~- <br /> <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The OSF (Operational Support Facility), located in Norman, Oklahoma, released a request for proposals <br />in the fall of 1994 seeking development of a SAA (snow accumulation algorithm). The SAA is intended <br />to be used with the recently-installed national network of NEXRAD (NEXt generation weather RADar). <br />Doppler weather radars. These installations are also referred to as WSR-88D (Weather Surveillance <br />Radar-1988 Doppler) radars. The NEXRAD network represents a major upgrade and improvement over <br />the aging systems it replaced (Crum et al., 1993). <br /> <br />Reclamation (Bureau of Reclamation) submitted a proposal to the OSF in mid-October 1994, which was <br />evaluated along with proposals from other Federal and Federally-supported agencies. An MOU <br />(memorandum of understanding) was signed the end of May 1995 among the NEXRAD Program, the <br />WSR-88D OSF, and Reclamation, which called for Reclamation to develop the SAA over a 3-year period. <br />The original MOU was modified in August 1995 to include collection of snow observations parallel to <br />the south shore of Lake Erie, east-northeast of Cleveland. Subsequent analysis of these snowfall and <br />radar measurements was expected to evaluate the ability of the developing SAA to detect and quantify <br />lake effect snowfall. A second modification in October 1996 tasked Reclamation with helping adapt the <br />SAA for real-time use and working with the NWS (National Weather Service) WFOs (Weather Forecast <br />Offices) at Cleveland and Minneapolis during the 1996-97 winter's real-time SAA testing. <br /> <br />The SAA converts radar measurements of equivalent (also called effective) reflectivity factor, Ze, into <br />estimates of the spatial distribution of SWE (snow water equivalent). The SAA also calculates SD (snow <br />depth) by multiplying SWE by estimated SD:SWE ratios. The SAA is limited to estimation of dry <br />snowfall. Complications in dealing with mixed rain and snow or melting snow with associated "bright <br />band" effects is beyond the scope of the requested work and resources available to accomplish it. <br /> <br />This annual report discusses Reclamation TSC (Technical Service Center) activities during the second <br />year of the 3-year effort to develop the SAA. Work done during the first year of SAA development was <br />reported by Super and Holroyd (1996). A prototype SAA was discussed in that report which was capable <br />of operating after the fact using Level II .data recorded on 8-mm tapes. As discussed by Crum et al. <br />(1993), Level II data are the most basic available to researchers. Level II data are the same as those <br />transmitted from the RDA (Radar Data Acquisition) computer to the RPG (Radar Product Generator) <br />workstation, where all algorithm processing is done. <br /> <br />The tasks performed during the second year of effort are paraphrased below with references given to the <br />tasks within the original MOU or its modifications. <br /> <br />1. Provide the annual report for the second year of effort by July 1, 1997 (specified in task 4 ofMOU <br />modification No.1). <br /> <br />Work done during the second year of SAA development is reported herein. <br /> <br />2. Reduce the precipitation gage charts for several lake effect storms of particular interest (task 3. of <br />MOU modification No.1). <br /> <br />As discussed by Super and Holroyd (1996), Reclamation operated a network of five Belfort Universal <br />gages, in protected locations, parallel to the south shore of Lake Erie during the 1995-96 winter. <br />SWE data from these gages have been extracted for all 24 storms identified during that unusually wet <br />